XEG
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF

Full XEG fund page
VS
NRGU
BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF

Full NRGU fund page

iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG) and BetaPro S&P/TSX Capped Energy 2x Daily Bull ETF (NRGU) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEG focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Energy, while NRGU leans towards Energy. When evaluating costs, XEG features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 1.15% for NRGU. Performance-wise, XEG has returned 42.5% year-to-date with +$106 M in net flows, whereas NRGU is at 95.6% with -$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10-50510%Apr 1Apr 9Apr 16Apr 23Apr 30

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 1, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEG
+4.17%+29.43%+42.50%+82.47%+100.13%
NRGU
+7.12%+62.95%+95.60%+203.69%+186.05%
Flows
XEG
-$36 M+$353 M+$106 M-$327 M-$712 M
NRGU
-$6 M-$7 M-$7 M-$17 M-$57 M

XEG vs NRGU exposure

Countries

XEG
Canada
99.62%
NRGU
Canada
85.70%
Other
14.30%

Sectors

XEG
Energy
99.17%
NRGU
Energy
85.70%
Other
14.30%
As of May 1, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEG
SUNCOR ENERGY
26.38%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
23.98%
CENOVUS ENERGY
12.23%
IMPERIAL OIL
6.69%
TOURMALINE OIL
5.99%
WHITECAP RESOURCES
4.66%
ARC RESOURCES
4.05%
PRAIRIESKY ROYALTY
1.83%
TAMARACK VALLEY ENERGY
1.37%
PEYTO EXPLORATION DEVELOPMENT
1.36%
NRGU
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
24.77%
SUNCOR ENERGY
23.27%
CENOVUS ENERGY
10.05%
TOURMALINE OIL
8.38%
ARC RESOURCES
5.58%
IMPERIAL OIL
5.19%
PRAIRIESKY ROYALTY
2.42%
MEG ENERGY
2.24%
WHITECAP RESOURCES
2.16%
CRESCENT POINT ENERGY
1.64%

Diversification

XEG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
88.55%
NRGU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 10 total
85.70%

Characteristics

Compare
XEG
NRGU
ProvideriSharesGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CADS&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingCapitalization
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.69%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 19, 2001June 18, 2007

Frequently asked questions about XEG and NRGU

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEG or NRGU?
As of May 1, 2026, XEG has returned 42.50% year to date, while NRGU has returned 95.60%. NRGU is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEG or NRGU?
As of May 1, 2026, XEG manages $2.32 B in assets, while NRGU manages $48.87 M. XEG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEG and NRGU managed?
XEG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD benchmark. NRGU is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XEG and NRGU emphasize?
XEG is most exposed to Energy. NRGU is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEG or NRGU?
Year to date, XEG has seen +$106.20 M in net flows, compared with -$7.24 M for NRGU. XEG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEG and NRGU compare?
XEG has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while NRGU has an expense ratio of 1.64%.
What are the top holdings of XEG and NRGU?
XEG's largest holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, CDN NATURAL RESOURCE, and CENOVUS ENERGY. NRGU's top holdings include CDN NATURAL RESOURCE, SUNCOR ENERGY, and CENOVUS ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEG or NRGU?
XEG holds 26 securities, while NRGU holds 10. On holdings count, XEG is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEG and NRGU

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds