XEG
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF

Full XEG fund page
VS
NRGY
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF

Full NRGY fund page

Compare iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas Index ETF (NRGY) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XEG and NRGY provide the same top sector exposures: Energy. When evaluating costs, XEG features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.4% for NRGY. Performance-wise, XEG has returned 30.33% year-to-date with +$292 M in net flows, whereas NRGY is at 29.44% with -$98 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-15.0-10.0-5.00.0%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 17, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEG
-13.41%-2.88%+30.33%+40.71%+91.43%
NRGY
-8.87%+2.51%+29.44%+38.96%-
Flows
XEG
+$206 M+$249 M+$292 M+$230 M-$626 M
NRGY
-$24 M-$80 M-$98 M-$59 M-

XEG vs NRGY exposure

Countries

XEG
Canada
99.95%
NRGY
Canada
76.81%
Other
23.19%

Sectors

XEG
Energy
99.50%
NRGY
Energy
76.81%
Other
23.19%
As of June 17, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEG
SUNCOR ENERGY
26.41%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
22.68%
CENOVUS ENERGY
13.03%
IMPERIAL OIL
6.61%
TOURMALINE OIL
5.86%
WHITECAP RESOURCES
4.71%
ARC RESOURCES
4.46%
PRAIRIESKY ROYALTY
1.94%
TAMARACK VALLEY ENERGY
1.50%
ATHABASCA OIL
1.39%
NRGY
CENOVUS ENERGY
9.47%
ARC RESOURCES
9.34%
SUNCOR ENERGY
8.86%
WHITECAP RESOURCES
8.83%
IMPERIAL OIL
8.55%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
8.05%
TC ENERGY CORP
7.97%
ENBRIDGE
7.95%
TOURMALINE OIL
7.79%

Diversification

XEG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
88.60%
NRGY
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
76.81%

Characteristics

Compare
XEG
NRGY
ProvideriSharesGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CADMirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.94%3.28%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateMarch 19, 2001November 7, 2024

Frequently asked questions about XEG and NRGY

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEG or NRGY?
As of June 17, 2026, XEG has returned 30.33% year to date, while NRGY has returned 29.44%. XEG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEG or NRGY?
As of June 17, 2026, XEG manages $2.30 B in assets, while NRGY manages $257.58 M. XEG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEG and NRGY managed?
XEG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD benchmark. NRGY is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Oil & Gas GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XEG and NRGY emphasize?
XEG is most exposed to Energy. NRGY is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEG or NRGY?
Year to date, XEG has seen +$291.76 M in net flows, compared with -$97.84 M for NRGY. XEG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEG and NRGY compare?
XEG has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while NRGY has an expense ratio of 0.27%.
What are the top holdings of XEG and NRGY?
XEG's largest holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, CDN NATURAL RESOURCE, and CENOVUS ENERGY. NRGY's top holdings include CENOVUS ENERGY, ARC RESOURCES, and SUNCOR ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEG or NRGY?
XEG holds 26 securities, while NRGY holds 9. On holdings count, XEG is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEG and NRGY

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds