VS
Compare iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index ETF - CAD (PPLN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XEG and PPLN provide the same top sector exposures: Energy. When evaluating costs, XEG features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.74% for PPLN. Performance-wise, XEG has returned 30.33% year-to-date with +$292 M in net flows, whereas PPLN is at 28.13% with -$15 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XEG
PPLN
| AuM | $2,304.12 M | $123.69 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.74% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.60% | 0.31% |
| Tracking Difference | 5.17% | -0.24% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEG | -13.41% | -2.88% | +30.33% | +40.71% | +91.43% |
PPLN | -2.01% | +8.91% | +28.13% | +40.47% | +67.71% | |
| Flows | XEG | +$206 M | +$249 M | +$292 M | +$230 M | -$626 M |
PPLN | -$2 M | +$15 M | -$15 M | +$60 M | +$66 M |
XEG vs PPLN exposure
Countries
XEG
Canada
99.95%
PPLN
Canada
78.98%
Other
21.02%
Sectors
XEG
Energy
99.50%
PPLN
Energy
78.98%
Other
21.02%
As of June 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XEG
SUNCOR ENERGY
26.41%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
22.68%
CENOVUS ENERGY
13.03%
IMPERIAL OIL
6.61%
TOURMALINE OIL
5.86%
WHITECAP RESOURCES
4.71%
ARC RESOURCES
4.46%
PRAIRIESKY ROYALTY
1.94%
TAMARACK VALLEY ENERGY
1.50%
ATHABASCA OIL
1.39%
PPLN
KEYERA
20.23%
TC ENERGY CORP
20.04%
ENBRIDGE
19.37%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
19.34%
Diversification
XEG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 26 total
88.60%
PPLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 4 total
78.98%
Characteristics
Compare
XEG
PPLN
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD | Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.94% | 4.28% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 19, 2001 | July 14, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about XEG and PPLN
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEG or PPLN?
As of June 17, 2026, XEG has returned 30.33% year to date, while PPLN has returned 28.13%. XEG is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEG or PPLN?
As of June 17, 2026, XEG manages $2.30 B in assets, while PPLN manages $123.69 M. XEG is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEG and PPLN managed?
XEG is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index - CAD benchmark. PPLN is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XEG and PPLN emphasize?
XEG is most exposed to Energy. PPLN is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEG or PPLN?
Year to date, XEG has seen +$291.76 M in net flows, compared with -$15.06 M for PPLN. XEG has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEG and PPLN compare?
XEG has an expense ratio of 0.60%, while PPLN has an expense ratio of 0.31%.
What are the top holdings of XEG and PPLN?
XEG's largest holdings include SUNCOR ENERGY, CDN NATURAL RESOURCE, and CENOVUS ENERGY. PPLN's top holdings include KEYERA, TC ENERGY CORP, and ENBRIDGE.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEG or PPLN?
XEG holds 26 securities, while PPLN holds 4. On holdings count, XEG is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XEG and PPLN
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.