Compare iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (CA) (XEMC) vs Franklin Emerging Markets Equity Index ETF (FLEM) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XEMC provides Technology, Finance, and Non-Energy Materials exposures, while FLEM is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XEMC features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.15% for FLEM. Performance-wise, XEMC has returned 37.76% year-to-date with +$65 M in net flows, whereas FLEM is at 22.82% with +$18 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
| AuM | $143.89 M | $65.50 M |
| Management Fees | 0.30% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.31% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.45% |
Historical performance and flows
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEMC | +1.82% | -4.59% | +37.76% | +59.96% | +107.41% |
FLEM | +1.52% | -4.58% | +22.82% | +35.16% | +83.93% | |
| Flows | XEMC | -$1 M | +$36 M | +$65 M | +$69 M | +$105 M |
FLEM | +$9 M | +$14 M | +$18 M | +$26 M | +$47 M |
XEMC vs FLEM exposure
Countries
Sectors
Top 10 Holdings
Diversification
Characteristics
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI Emerging Markets ex China NTR Index - USD | Solactive GBS Emerging Markets Large & Mid Cap CAD Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.72% | 1.35% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 7, 2023 | January 29, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about XEMC and FLEM
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEMC or FLEM?
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEMC or FLEM?
How are XEMC and FLEM managed?
What sectors do XEMC and FLEM emphasize?
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEMC or FLEM?
How do the fees of XEMC and FLEM compare?
What are the top holdings of XEMC and FLEM?
Which ETF is more diversified: XEMC or FLEM?
Recent articles about XEMC and FLEM

Reasons to Start 2023 with Encouragement - Year End ETF Review and Outlook
In the ETF world, positive flows were sustained throughout 2022 and a wide range of new products were launched, even with all the volatility in the marketplace. A 2022 year in ETF review offers some encouragement to ETF investors.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.




