VS
When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.11% for CASH. Performance-wise, XEQT has returned 6.52% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas CASH is at 0.64% with +$96 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XEQT
CASH
| AuM | $16,499.14 M | $6,743.55 M |
| Management Fees | 0.18% | 0.11% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEQT | +7.57% | +2.87% | +6.52% | +32.19% | +72.74% |
CASH | +0.17% | +0.49% | +0.64% | +2.29% | +11.62% | |
| Flows | XEQT | +$697 M | +$2,515 M | +$3,443 M | +$6,868 M | +$11,573 M |
CASH | -$112 M | -$62 M | +$96 M | +$176 M | +$4,336 M |
XEQT vs CASH exposure
Countries
XEQT
USA
41.95%
Canada
26.03%
Other
32.02%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
XEQT
Information Technology
19.08%
Financials
18.45%
Industrials
10.70%
Energy
7.76%
Consumer Discretionary
7.73%
Other
7.44%
Other
28.84%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
As of April 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XEQT
NVIDIA
2.89%
APPLE
2.54%
MICROSOFT-T
1.88%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.76%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.39%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.22%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.14%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.13%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.00%
ENBRIDGE
0.92%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,328 total
15.88%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about XEQT and CASH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEQT or CASH?
As of April 24, 2026, XEQT has returned 6.52% year to date, while CASH has returned 0.64%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or CASH?
As of April 24, 2026, XEQT manages $16.50 B in assets, while CASH manages $6.74 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and CASH managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. CASH is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEQT or CASH?
Year to date, XEQT has seen +$3,442.84 M in net flows, compared with +$95.65 M for CASH. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEQT and CASH compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while CASH has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about XEQT and CASH
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.