VS
When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.11% for CASH. Performance-wise, XEQT has returned 12.89% year-to-date with +$7 B in net flows, whereas CASH is at 1.15% with -$112 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XEQT
CASH
| AuM | $20,445.57 M | $6,541.10 M |
| Management Fees | 0.18% | 0.11% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.11% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEQT | -0.07% | +5.98% | +12.89% | +24.89% | +77.07% |
CASH | +0.17% | +0.51% | +1.15% | +2.17% | +10.81% | |
| Flows | XEQT | +$1,156 M | +$3,103 M | +$6,509 M | +$9,051 M | +$14,463 M |
CASH | -$133 M | -$209 M | -$112 M | -$224 M | +$3,599 M |
XEQT vs CASH exposure
Countries
XEQT
USA
44.97%
Canada
23.95%
Other
31.08%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
XEQT
Technology
25.85%
Finance
24.22%
Industrials
10.42%
Non-Energy Materials
7.44%
Other
32.06%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
As of July 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XEQT
NVIDIA Corp.
3.02%
Apple, Inc.
2.65%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.05%
Microsoft Corp.
1.72%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.45%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.44%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.30%
Broadcom Inc.
1.11%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.04%
Shopify, Inc.
0.99%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,337 total
16.77%
CASH
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Frequently asked questions about XEQT and CASH
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEQT or CASH?
As of July 24, 2026, XEQT has returned 12.89% year to date, while CASH has returned 1.15%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or CASH?
As of July 24, 2026, XEQT manages $20.45 B in assets, while CASH manages $6.54 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and CASH managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. CASH is actively managed by Global X. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEQT or CASH?
Year to date, XEQT has seen +$6,509.05 M in net flows, compared with -$111.62 M for CASH. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEQT and CASH compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while CASH has an expense ratio of 0.11%.
Recent articles about XEQT and CASH
ETF Comparison: XEQT vs. VEQT
A side-by-side comparison of XEQT and VEQT, Canada's two leading all-equity portfolio ETFs.
Posted 5 days ago by Kyle Anthony inEquities
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.