VS
iShares Core Equity ETF (XEQT) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEQT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while CHPS leans towards Information Technology. When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.64% for CHPS. Performance-wise, XEQT has returned 12.34% year-to-date with +$5 B in net flows, whereas CHPS is at 60.85% with +$108 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XEQT
CHPS
| AuM | $19,047.01 M | $380.79 M |
| Management Fees | 0.18% | 0.64% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEQT | +2.94% | +12.10% | +12.34% | +29.46% | +81.40% |
CHPS | +14.11% | +53.52% | +60.85% | +118.08% | +225.77% | |
| Flows | XEQT | +$1,205 M | +$2,593 M | +$5,053 M | +$8,146 M | +$13,098 M |
CHPS | +$44 M | +$81 M | +$108 M | +$129 M | +$157 M |
XEQT vs CHPS exposure
Countries
XEQT
USA
42.85%
Canada
25.60%
Other
31.55%
CHPS
USA
87.93%
Other
12.07%
Sectors
XEQT
Information Technology
20.56%
Financials
18.58%
Industrials
10.76%
Consumer Discretionary
7.76%
Other
7.36%
Energy
7.32%
Other
27.65%
CHPS
Information Technology
57.60%
Other
42.40%
As of June 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XEQT
NVIDIA
3.07%
APPLE
2.52%
MICROSOFT-T
1.92%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.81%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.64%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.42%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.30%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.25%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.13%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.07%
CHPS
NVIDIA
19.14%
BROADCOM LIMITED
16.16%
US8740391003
14.87%
USN070592100
9.77%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
9.66%
US5128073062
5.69%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.63%
KLA CORPORATION
4.31%
QUALCOMM
2.70%
Diversification
XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,365 total
17.13%
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 9 total
87.93%
Characteristics
Compare
XEQT
CHPS
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.49% | 0.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 7, 2019 | June 22, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XEQT and CHPS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEQT or CHPS?
As of June 12, 2026, XEQT has returned 12.34% year to date, while CHPS has returned 60.85%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or CHPS?
As of June 12, 2026, XEQT manages $19.05 B in assets, while CHPS manages $380.79 M. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and CHPS managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XEQT and CHPS emphasize?
XEQT is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEQT or CHPS?
Year to date, XEQT has seen +$5,053.19 M in net flows, compared with +$108.35 M for CHPS. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEQT and CHPS compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of XEQT and CHPS?
XEQT's largest holdings include NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL. CHPS's top holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEQT or CHPS?
XEQT holds 7454 securities, while CHPS holds 7. On holdings count, XEQT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XEQT and CHPS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.