VS
iShares Core Equity ETF (XEQT) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEQT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while CHPS leans towards Information Technology. When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.64% for CHPS. Performance-wise, XEQT has returned 6.52% year-to-date with +$3 B in net flows, whereas CHPS is at 33.96% with +$47 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XEQT
CHPS
| AuM | $16,499.14 M | $261.34 M |
| Management Fees | 0.18% | 0.64% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.20% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEQT | +7.57% | +2.87% | +6.52% | +32.19% | +72.74% |
CHPS | +23.90% | +22.49% | +33.96% | +126.05% | +228.83% | |
| Flows | XEQT | +$697 M | +$2,515 M | +$3,443 M | +$6,868 M | +$11,573 M |
CHPS | +$20 M | +$33 M | +$47 M | +$67 M | +$96 M |
XEQT vs CHPS exposure
Countries
XEQT
USA
41.95%
Canada
26.03%
Other
32.02%
CHPS
USA
99.85%
Sectors
XEQT
Information Technology
19.08%
Financials
18.45%
Industrials
10.70%
Energy
7.76%
Consumer Discretionary
7.73%
Other
7.44%
Other
28.84%
CHPS
Information Technology
63.13%
Other
36.87%
As of April 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XEQT
NVIDIA
2.89%
APPLE
2.54%
MICROSOFT-T
1.88%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.76%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.39%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.22%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.14%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.13%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.00%
ENBRIDGE
0.92%
CHPS
NVIDIA
20.57%
US8740391003
16.02%
BROADCOM LIMITED
15.18%
USN070592100
11.36%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES
7.25%
APPLIED MATERIAL
5.93%
US5128073062
5.83%
KLA CORPORATION
4.21%
US0420682058
3.51%
QUALCOMM
3.00%
Diversification
XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,328 total
15.88%
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
92.86%
Characteristics
Compare
XEQT
CHPS
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.57% | 0.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 7, 2019 | June 22, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XEQT and CHPS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEQT or CHPS?
As of April 24, 2026, XEQT has returned 6.52% year to date, while CHPS has returned 33.96%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or CHPS?
As of April 24, 2026, XEQT manages $16.50 B in assets, while CHPS manages $261.34 M. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and CHPS managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XEQT and CHPS emphasize?
XEQT is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. CHPS is most exposed to Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEQT or CHPS?
Year to date, XEQT has seen +$3,442.84 M in net flows, compared with +$47.03 M for CHPS. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEQT and CHPS compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of XEQT and CHPS?
XEQT's largest holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE. CHPS's top holdings include NVIDIA and BROADCOM LIMITED.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEQT or CHPS?
XEQT holds 7453 securities, while CHPS holds 15. On holdings count, XEQT is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XEQT and CHPS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.