XEQT
iShares Core Equity ETF

Full XEQT fund page
VS
CHPS
Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF

Full CHPS fund page

iShares Core Equity ETF (XEQT) and Global X Artificial Intelligence Semiconductor Index ETF (CHPS) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEQT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Industrials, while CHPS leans towards Technology. When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.64% for CHPS. Performance-wise, XEQT has returned 14.76% year-to-date with +$8 B in net flows, whereas CHPS is at 41.83% with +$133 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.0%Aug 14Aug 21Aug 28Sep 4Sep 14

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 14, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEQT
-1.95%+0.82%+14.76%+19.91%+78.93%
CHPS
-8.46%-15.51%+41.83%+57.86%+195.00%
Flows
XEQT
+$1,009 M+$3,041 M+$8,094 M+$9,876 M+$15,941 M
CHPS
+$4 M+$25 M+$133 M+$150 M+$186 M

XEQT vs CHPS exposure

Countries

XEQT
USA
44.48%
Canada
24.66%
Other
30.86%
CHPS
USA
69.15%
Taiwan
17.85%
Netherlands
9.25%

Sectors

XEQT
Finance
25.23%
Technology
24.35%
Industrials
10.32%
Non-Energy Materials
7.46%
Energy
7.10%
Other
25.54%
CHPS
Technology
99.95%
As of September 14, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEQT
Apple, Inc.
3.05%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.94%
Microsoft Corp.
2.08%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.43%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.41%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.22%
Broadcom Inc.
1.14%
Shopify, Inc.
1.05%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.98%
CHPS
NVIDIA Corp.
20.67%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.85%
Broadcom Inc.
14.21%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
11.20%
ASML Holding NV
9.25%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.82%
Lam Research Corp.
5.29%
Arm Holdings Plc
3.70%
KLA Corp.
3.45%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.37%

Diversification

XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,298 total
17.37%
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
93.81%

Characteristics

Compare
XEQT
CHPS
ProvideriSharesGlobal X
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.59%0.01%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 7, 2019June 22, 2021

Frequently asked questions about XEQT and CHPS

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEQT or CHPS?
As of September 14, 2026, XEQT has returned 14.76% year to date, while CHPS has returned 41.83%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or CHPS?
As of September 14, 2026, XEQT manages $22.36 B in assets, while CHPS manages $357.41 M. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and CHPS managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XEQT and CHPS emphasize?
XEQT is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. CHPS is most exposed to Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEQT or CHPS?
Year to date, XEQT has seen +$8,093.93 M in net flows, compared with +$132.95 M for CHPS. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEQT and CHPS compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of XEQT and CHPS?
XEQT's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. CHPS's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd., and Broadcom Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XEQT or CHPS?
XEQT holds 8200 securities, while CHPS holds 18. On holdings count, XEQT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEQT and CHPS

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds