VS
When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.64% for CHPS. Performance-wise, XEQT has returned 15.33% year-to-date with +$9 B in net flows, whereas CHPS is at 47.27% with +$150 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XEQT
CHPS
| AuM | $23,762.23 M | $389.52 M |
| Management Fees | 0.18% | 0.64% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.19% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 27, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XEQT | -0.61% | +1.69% | +15.33% | +15.46% | +93.01% |
CHPS | -8.31% | +0.30% | +47.27% | +38.70% | +233.98% | |
| Flows | XEQT | +$1,043 M | +$2,930 M | +$9,439 M | +$10,479 M | +$17,193 M |
CHPS | +$22 M | +$10 M | +$150 M | +$160 M | +$205 M |
XEQT vs CHPS exposure
Countries
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
CHPS
USA
68.99%
Taiwan
17.93%
Netherlands
9.42%
Sectors
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
CHPS
Technology
99.99%
As of October 27, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
CHPS
NVIDIA Corp.
22.23%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.
17.93%
Broadcom Inc.
13.22%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
10.83%
ASML Holding NV
9.42%
Lam Research Corp.
5.32%
Applied Materials, Inc.
5.14%
Arm Holdings Plc
3.65%
KLA Corp.
3.23%
Marvell Technology, Inc.
2.61%
Diversification
XEQT
Exposure data will be available soon
CHPS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 18 total
93.58%
Characteristics
Compare
XEQT
CHPS
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD |
| Replication Method | - | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.59% | 0.01% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 7, 2019 | June 22, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XEQT and CHPS
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEQT or CHPS?
As of October 27, 2026, XEQT has returned 15.33% year to date, while CHPS has returned 47.27%. CHPS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or CHPS?
As of October 27, 2026, XEQT manages $23.76 B in assets, while CHPS manages $389.52 M. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and CHPS managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. CHPS is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the PHLX US AI Semiconductor Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEQT or CHPS?
Year to date, XEQT has seen +$9,439.23 M in net flows, compared with +$150.13 M for CHPS. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEQT and CHPS compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while CHPS has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
Recent articles about XEQT and CHPS
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.