XEQT
iShares Core Equity ETF

Full XEQT fund page
VS
ONEQ
CI ONE Global Equity ETF

Full ONEQ fund page

iShares Core Equity ETF (XEQT) and CI ONE Global Equity ETF (ONEQ) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEQT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while ONEQ leans towards Information Technology, Financials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.85% for ONEQ. Performance-wise, XEQT has returned 10.22% year-to-date with +$4 B in net flows, whereas ONEQ is at 12.41% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.0%Apr 21Apr 28May 5May 12May 20

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of May 21, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEQT
+4.34%+5.27%+10.22%+29.50%+80.73%
ONEQ
+4.92%+6.51%+12.41%+31.75%+78.71%
Flows
XEQT
+$942 M+$2,493 M+$4,225 M+$7,478 M+$12,301 M
ONEQ
-$3 M-$0 M-$0 M-$10 M-$20 M

XEQT vs ONEQ exposure

Countries

XEQT
USA
41.95%
Canada
26.03%
Other
32.02%
ONEQ
USA
47.69%
Canada
34.11%
Other
18.19%

Sectors

XEQT
Information Technology
19.08%
Financials
18.45%
Industrials
10.70%
Energy
7.76%
Consumer Discretionary
7.73%
Other
7.44%
Other
28.84%
ONEQ
Information Technology
22.02%
Financials
13.59%
Other
10.97%
Energy
10.64%
Industrials
8.01%
Other
34.76%
As of May 21, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEQT
NVIDIA
2.89%
APPLE
2.54%
MICROSOFT-T
1.88%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.76%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.39%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.22%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.14%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.13%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.00%
ENBRIDGE
0.92%
ONEQ
NVIDIA
11.02%
SUNCOR ENERGY
3.75%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
3.67%
LOBLAW COMPANIES
3.29%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.58%
ROYAL BK CANADA
2.13%
US8740391003
1.99%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC
1.90%
META PLATFORMS
1.73%
USN070592100
1.72%

Diversification

XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,328 total
15.88%
ONEQ
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 7,690 total
33.79%

Characteristics

Compare
XEQT
ONEQ
ProvideriSharesCI
ManagementActively managedActively managed
Benchmark--
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.51%1.49%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 7, 2019September 25, 2015

Frequently asked questions about XEQT and ONEQ

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEQT or ONEQ?
As of May 21, 2026, XEQT has returned 10.22% year to date, while ONEQ has returned 12.41%. ONEQ is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or ONEQ?
As of May 21, 2026, XEQT manages $17.87 B in assets, while ONEQ manages $56.01 M. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and ONEQ managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. ONEQ is actively managed by CI. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XEQT and ONEQ emphasize?
XEQT is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. ONEQ is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEQT or ONEQ?
Year to date, XEQT has seen +$4,224.56 M in net flows, compared with -$0.08 M for ONEQ. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEQT and ONEQ compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while ONEQ has an expense ratio of 0.97%.
What are the top holdings of XEQT and ONEQ?
XEQT's largest holdings include NVIDIA and APPLE. ONEQ's top holdings include NVIDIA and SUNCOR ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEQT or ONEQ?
XEQT holds 7453 securities, while ONEQ holds 6714. On holdings count, XEQT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEQT and ONEQ

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds