XEQT
iShares Core Equity ETF

Full XEQT fund page
VS
XEF
iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF

Full XEF fund page

iShares Core Equity ETF (XEQT) and iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEQT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Industrials, while XEF leans towards Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.2% for XEF. Performance-wise, XEQT has returned 14.79% year-to-date with +$8 B in net flows, whereas XEF is at 13.98% with +$5 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.5-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.51.0%Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25Sep 1Sep 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEQT
-1.41%+2.68%+14.79%+20.00%+79.80%
XEF
-1.73%+4.30%+13.98%+18.38%+68.01%
Flows
XEQT
+$1,135 M+$3,086 M+$8,058 M+$9,883 M+$15,910 M
XEF
+$664 M+$1,792 M+$5,110 M+$6,919 M+$11,896 M

XEQT vs XEF exposure

Countries

XEQT
USA
44.48%
Canada
24.66%
Other
30.86%
XEF
Japan
24.79%
United Kingdom
13.81%
Switzerland
9.26%
France
8.14%
Germany
8.12%
Australia
7.05%
Other
28.83%

Sectors

XEQT
Finance
25.23%
Technology
24.35%
Industrials
10.32%
Non-Energy Materials
7.46%
Energy
7.10%
Other
25.54%
XEF
Finance
27.43%
Industrials
16.38%
Technology
11.80%
Healthcare
9.36%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.07%
Non-Energy Materials
7.48%
Other
19.48%
As of September 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEQT
Apple, Inc.
3.05%
NVIDIA Corp.
2.94%
Microsoft Corp.
2.08%
Royal Bank of Canada
2.07%
Amazon.com, Inc.
1.43%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
1.41%
Alphabet, Inc.
1.22%
Broadcom Inc.
1.14%
Shopify, Inc.
1.05%
Alphabet, Inc.
0.98%
XEF
ASML Holding NV
2.51%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.43%
Roche Holding AG
1.20%
Novartis AG
1.12%
Nestlé SA
1.02%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.01%
Shell Plc
0.98%
Siemens AG
0.94%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.92%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.82%

Diversification

XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,298 total
17.37%
XEF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,648 total
11.94%

Characteristics

Compare
XEQT
XEF
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-MSCI EAFE IMI Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication Method
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.59%2.32%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 7, 2019April 10, 2013

Frequently asked questions about XEQT and XEF

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEQT or XEF?
As of September 11, 2026, XEQT has returned 14.79% year to date, while XEF has returned 13.98%. XEQT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or XEF?
As of September 11, 2026, XEQT manages $22.33 B in assets, while XEF manages $23.81 B. XEF is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and XEF managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. XEF is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE IMI Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XEQT and XEF emphasize?
XEQT is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. XEF is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEQT or XEF?
Year to date, XEQT has seen +$8,057.69 M in net flows, compared with +$5,109.84 M for XEF. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEQT and XEF compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while XEF has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What are the top holdings of XEQT and XEF?
XEQT's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. XEF's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEQT or XEF?
XEQT holds 8200 securities, while XEF holds 2636. On holdings count, XEQT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEQT and XEF

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds