XEQT
iShares Core Equity ETF

Full XEQT fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

iShares Core Equity ETF (XEQT) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEQT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials, while ZEB leans towards Financials. When evaluating costs, XEQT features a management fee (MER) of 0.18%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, XEQT has returned 12.34% year-to-date with +$5 B in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 25.29% with -$1,134 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.08.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEQT
+2.94%+12.10%+12.34%+29.46%+81.40%
ZEB
+8.46%+23.65%+25.29%+67.84%+147.83%
Flows
XEQT
+$1,205 M+$2,593 M+$5,053 M+$8,146 M+$13,098 M
ZEB
-$103 M-$237 M-$1,134 M-$935 M-$1,914 M

XEQT vs ZEB exposure

Countries

XEQT
USA
42.85%
Canada
25.60%
Other
31.55%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

XEQT
Information Technology
20.56%
Financials
18.58%
Industrials
10.76%
Consumer Discretionary
7.76%
Other
7.36%
Energy
7.32%
Other
27.65%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEQT
NVIDIA
3.07%
APPLE
2.52%
MICROSOFT-T
1.92%
ROYAL BK CANADA
1.81%
AMAZON.COM INC
1.64%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.42%
TORONTO DOMINION
1.30%
BROADCOM LIMITED
1.25%
ALPHABET INC-CL
1.13%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
1.07%
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%

Diversification

XEQT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 8,365 total
17.13%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
XEQT
ZEB
ProvideriSharesBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.49%2.41%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 7, 2019October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about XEQT and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEQT or ZEB?
As of June 12, 2026, XEQT has returned 12.34% year to date, while ZEB has returned 25.29%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEQT or ZEB?
As of June 12, 2026, XEQT manages $19.05 B in assets, while ZEB manages $5.58 B. XEQT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEQT and ZEB managed?
XEQT is actively managed by iShares. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XEQT and ZEB emphasize?
XEQT is most exposed to Information Technology, Financials, and Industrials. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEQT or ZEB?
Year to date, XEQT has seen +$5,053.19 M in net flows, compared with -$1,133.77 M for ZEB. XEQT has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEQT and ZEB compare?
XEQT has an expense ratio of 0.20%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XEQT and ZEB?
XEQT's largest holdings include NVIDIA and ALPHABET INC-CL. ZEB's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEQT or ZEB?
XEQT holds 7454 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, XEQT is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XEQT and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds