XEU
iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF

Full XEU fund page
VS
XIN
iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF

Full XIN fund page

iShares MSCI Europe IMI Index ETF (XEU) and iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XEU focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Industrials, and Healthcare, while XIN leans towards Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XEU features a management fee (MER) of 0.25%, compared to 0.5% for XIN. Performance-wise, XEU has returned 12.87% year-to-date with +$36 M in net flows, whereas XIN is at 14.12% with +$124 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 3Nov 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of November 11, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XEU
+3.79%-0.81%+12.87%+13.90%+70.43%
XIN
+1.83%-0.82%+14.12%+15.12%+61.66%
Flows
XEU
-$4 M+$4 M+$36 M+$40 M+$214 M
XIN
-$3 M-$13 M+$124 M+$128 M+$86 M

XEU vs XIN exposure

Countries

XEU
United Kingdom
22.14%
Switzerland
14.46%
Germany
12.84%
France
12.65%
Netherlands
9.93%
Other
27.97%
XIN
Japan
24.69%
United Kingdom
13.72%
Switzerland
9.56%
Germany
8.47%
France
8.36%
Other
35.20%

Sectors

XEU
Finance
25.70%
Industrials
16.99%
Healthcare
11.51%
Technology
10.87%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.07%
Other
26.86%
XIN
Finance
27.54%
Industrials
15.69%
Technology
13.59%
Healthcare
9.59%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.83%
Other
25.76%
As of November 11, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XEU
ASML Holding NV
4.42%
US46434V7385
3.73%
HSBC Holdings Plc
2.15%
Roche Holding AG
1.84%
Shell Plc
1.72%
Novartis AG
1.65%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.54%
Nestlé SA
1.47%
Siemens AG
1.42%
SAP SE
1.34%
XIN
US4642874659
99.94%

Diversification

XEU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,176 total
21.29%
XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 658 total
99.94%

Characteristics

Compare
XEU
XIN
ProvideriSharesiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI Europe IMI Net Total Return Index - CADMSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherOther
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.62%2.72%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateApril 15, 2014September 6, 2011

Frequently asked questions about XEU and XIN

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XEU or XIN?
As of November 11, 2026, XEU has returned 12.87% year to date, while XIN has returned 14.12%. XIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XEU or XIN?
As of November 11, 2026, XEU manages $708.79 M in assets, while XIN manages $1.95 B. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XEU and XIN managed?
XEU is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI Europe IMI Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XEU or XIN?
XEU holds 1156 securities, while XIN holds 1. On holdings count, XEU is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XEU or XIN?
Year to date, XEU has seen +$36.01 M in net flows, compared with +$123.97 M for XIN. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XEU and XIN compare?
XEU has an expense ratio of 0.29%, while XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%.
What sectors do XEU and XIN emphasize?
XEU is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Healthcare. XIN is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.

Recent articles about XEU and XIN

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds