VS
iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (XGI) and BMO SPDR Industrials Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XGI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials and Information Technology, while ZXLI leans towards Industrials and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, XGI features a management fee (MER) of 0.63%, compared to 0.21% for ZXLI. Performance-wise, XGI has returned 10.86% year-to-date with +$10 M in net flows, whereas ZXLI is at 15.07% with +$15 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XGI
ZXLI
| AuM | $161.56 M | $23.71 M |
| Management Fees | 0.63% | 0.21% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.97% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XGI | -0.92% | +2.49% | +10.86% | +21.18% | +67.77% |
ZXLI | +2.11% | +6.40% | +15.07% | +25.40% | - | |
| Flows | XGI | +$5 M | -$3 M | +$10 M | +$18 M | +$50 M |
ZXLI | -$1 M | -$7 M | +$15 M | +$17 M | - |
XGI vs ZXLI exposure
Countries
XGI
USA
51.03%
Japan
13.80%
Other
35.17%
ZXLI
USA
92.73%
Ireland
7.19%
Sectors
XGI
Industrials
91.68%
Other
8.32%
ZXLI
Industrials
91.43%
Other
8.57%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XGI
CATERPILLAR
4.15%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
3.05%
US36828A1016
2.93%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
2.37%
SIEMENS
2.19%
BOEING U
1.80%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
1.71%
EATON CORP PLC
1.69%
UNION PACIFIC U
1.60%
ABB
1.56%
ZXLI
CATERPILLAR
7.61%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.59%
US36828A1016
5.36%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
4.34%
BOEING U
3.30%
EATON CORP PLC
3.09%
UNION PACIFIC U
2.94%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.82%
DEERE
2.73%
HONEYWELL INTL
2.50%
Diversification
XGI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 213 total
23.05%
ZXLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 79 total
40.28%
Characteristics
Compare
XGI
ZXLI
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.40% | 1.81% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | March 26, 2013 | February 2, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about XGI and ZXLI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XGI or ZXLI?
As of June 11, 2026, XGI has returned 10.86% year to date, while ZXLI has returned 15.07%. ZXLI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XGI or ZXLI?
As of June 11, 2026, XGI manages $161.56 M in assets, while ZXLI manages $23.71 M. XGI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XGI and ZXLI managed?
XGI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZXLI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XGI and ZXLI emphasize?
XGI is most exposed to Industrials and Information Technology. ZXLI is most exposed to Industrials and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XGI or ZXLI?
Year to date, XGI has seen +$10.02 M in net flows, compared with +$15.46 M for ZXLI. ZXLI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XGI and ZXLI compare?
XGI has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while ZXLI has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of XGI and ZXLI?
XGI's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. ZXLI's top holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC.
Which ETF is more diversified: XGI or ZXLI?
XGI holds 197 securities, while ZXLI holds 77. On holdings count, XGI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XGI and ZXLI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.