VS
Compare iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (XHC) vs BMO Global Health Care Fund Active ETF Series (BGHC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XHC and BGHC provide the same top sector exposures: Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. When evaluating costs, XHC features a management fee (MER) of 0.63%, compared to 1.02% for BGHC. Performance-wise, XHC has returned 1.14% year-to-date with -$63 M in net flows, whereas BGHC is at 0.8% with +$7 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XHC
BGHC
| AuM | $491.71 M | $9.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.63% | 1.02% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.82% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.63% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XHC | +6.47% | +0.19% | -1.14% | +10.26% | +13.40% |
BGHC | +9.21% | +4.30% | +0.80% | +14.50% | - | |
| Flows | XHC | -$20 M | -$45 M | -$63 M | -$27 M | -$110 M |
BGHC | +$1 M | +$1 M | +$7 M | -$112 M | - |
XHC vs BGHC exposure
Countries
XHC
USA
68.08%
Switzerland
10.40%
Other
21.52%
BGHC
USA
77.24%
Switzerland
9.55%
United Kingdom
7.13%
Sectors
XHC
Health Care
89.82%
Other
8.80%
BGHC
Health Care
87.36%
Other
12.63%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XHC
LILLY
9.68%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.24%
ABBVIE
4.88%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.49%
ASTRAZENECA
3.93%
CH1499059983
3.82%
NOVARTIS
3.77%
MERCK & CO INC
3.62%
AMGEN-T
2.49%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2.41%
BGHC
LILLY
9.10%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.43%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
7.29%
ASTRAZENECA
6.43%
ABBVIE
4.82%
MERCK & CO INC
4.69%
US04016X1019
4.48%
UCB
4.40%
MCKESSON
4.23%
NOVARTIS
3.94%
Diversification
XHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 113 total
46.33%
BGHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 120 total
56.80%
Characteristics
Compare
XHC
BGHC
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | - |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.90% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 12, 2011 | June 26, 2023 |
Frequently asked questions about XHC and BGHC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XHC or BGHC?
As of June 11, 2026, XHC has returned -1.14% year to date, while BGHC has returned 0.80%. BGHC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XHC or BGHC?
As of June 11, 2026, XHC manages $491.71 M in assets, while BGHC manages $9.43 M. XHC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XHC and BGHC managed?
XHC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. BGHC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index.
What sectors do XHC and BGHC emphasize?
XHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. BGHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XHC or BGHC?
Year to date, XHC has seen -$63.06 M in net flows, compared with +$6.51 M for BGHC. BGHC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XHC and BGHC compare?
XHC has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while BGHC has an expense ratio of 0.82%.
What are the top holdings of XHC and BGHC?
XHC's largest holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. BGHC's top holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON.
Which ETF is more diversified: XHC or BGHC?
XHC holds 102 securities, while BGHC holds 107. On holdings count, BGHC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XHC and BGHC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.