VS
Compare iShares Global Healthcare Index ETF (XHC) vs TD Global Healthcare Leaders Index ETF (TDOC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XHC provides Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples exposures, while TDOC is primarily weighted in Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, XHC features a management fee (MER) of 0.63%, compared to 0.35% for TDOC. Performance-wise, XHC has returned 1.14% year-to-date with -$63 M in net flows, whereas TDOC is at 2.82% with +$30 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XHC
TDOC
| AuM | $491.71 M | $121.85 M |
| Management Fees | 0.63% | 0.35% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.66% | 0.39% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.63% | -0.42% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XHC | +6.47% | +0.19% | -1.14% | +10.26% | +13.40% |
TDOC | +5.37% | -0.48% | -2.82% | +6.68% | +15.93% | |
| Flows | XHC | -$20 M | -$45 M | -$63 M | -$27 M | -$110 M |
TDOC | +$15 M | +$21 M | +$30 M | +$39 M | +$72 M |
XHC vs TDOC exposure
Countries
XHC
USA
68.08%
Switzerland
10.40%
Other
21.52%
TDOC
USA
61.08%
Japan
7.94%
Other
30.98%
Sectors
XHC
Health Care
89.82%
Other
8.80%
TDOC
Health Care
89.63%
Other
9.16%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XHC
LILLY
9.68%
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
7.24%
ABBVIE
4.88%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
4.49%
ASTRAZENECA
3.93%
CH1499059983
3.82%
NOVARTIS
3.77%
MERCK & CO INC
3.62%
AMGEN-T
2.49%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC
2.41%
TDOC
JOHNSON&JOHNSON
2.36%
GSK PLC
2.32%
PFIZER
2.31%
UNITEDHEALTH GRP
2.26%
GILEAD SCIENCES
2.23%
NOVARTIS
2.22%
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB
2.22%
MERCK & CO INC
2.21%
MCKESSON
2.19%
AMGEN-T
2.17%
Diversification
XHC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 113 total
46.33%
TDOC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 102 total
22.49%
Characteristics
Compare
XHC
TDOC
| Provider | iShares | TD Asset Management |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.90% | 1.18% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 12, 2011 | April 14, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about XHC and TDOC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XHC or TDOC?
As of June 11, 2026, XHC has returned -1.14% year to date, while TDOC has returned -2.82%. XHC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XHC or TDOC?
As of June 11, 2026, XHC manages $491.71 M in assets, while TDOC manages $121.85 M. XHC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XHC and TDOC managed?
XHC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Health Care CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. TDOC is passively managed by TD Asset Management. It tracks the Solactive Global Healthcare Leaders Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XHC and TDOC emphasize?
XHC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Discretionary, and Consumer Staples. TDOC is most exposed to Health Care, Consumer Staples, and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XHC or TDOC?
Year to date, XHC has seen -$63.06 M in net flows, compared with +$29.96 M for TDOC. TDOC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XHC and TDOC compare?
XHC has an expense ratio of 0.66%, while TDOC has an expense ratio of 0.39%.
What are the top holdings of XHC and TDOC?
XHC's largest holdings include LILLY and JOHNSON&JOHNSON. TDOC's top holdings include JOHNSON&JOHNSON and GSK PLC.
Which ETF is more diversified: XHC or TDOC?
XHC holds 102 securities, while TDOC holds 99. On holdings count, XHC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XHC and TDOC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.