VS
Compare iShares MSCI EAFE Index ETF (XIN) vs Franklin International Equity Index ETF (FLUR) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XIN and FLUR provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.5%, compared to 0.09% for FLUR. Performance-wise, XIN has returned 13.64% year-to-date with +$139 M in net flows, whereas FLUR is at 15.16% with +$101 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XIN
FLUR
| AuM | $1,954.04 M | $623.82 M |
| Management Fees | 0.50% | 0.09% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.48% | 0.10% |
| Tracking Difference | -1.39% | -0.29% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XIN | -0.45% | +3.77% | +13.64% | +23.12% | +59.67% |
FLUR | -0.58% | +4.30% | +15.16% | +23.73% | +69.89% | |
| Flows | XIN | +$4 M | +$5 M | +$139 M | +$174 M | +$89 M |
FLUR | +$12 M | +$35 M | +$101 M | +$126 M | +$286 M |
XIN vs FLUR exposure
Countries
XIN
Japan
22.80%
United Kingdom
13.92%
Switzerland
10.04%
France
8.85%
Germany
8.78%
Other
35.61%
FLUR
Japan
21.51%
United Kingdom
14.57%
Switzerland
9.53%
Germany
8.72%
France
8.45%
Australia
7.66%
Other
29.56%
Sectors
XIN
Finance
28.05%
Industrials
15.78%
Technology
11.97%
Healthcare
9.97%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.29%
Other
25.95%
FLUR
Finance
29.31%
Industrials
15.42%
Technology
11.13%
Healthcare
10.22%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.14%
Other
25.79%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XIN
ASML Holding NV
2.91%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.66%
Roche Holding AG
1.39%
Novartis AG
1.30%
Nestlé SA
1.19%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.17%
Shell Plc
1.13%
Siemens AG
1.09%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.07%
BHP Group Ltd.
0.95%
FLUR
ASML Holding NV
2.96%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.71%
Roche Holding AG
1.50%
Novartis AG
1.38%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.27%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.24%
Nestlé SA
1.22%
Shell Plc
1.18%
Siemens AG
1.07%
BHP Group Ltd.
1.01%
Diversification
XIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 674 total
13.87%
FLUR
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 696 total
14.53%
Characteristics
Compare
XIN
FLUR
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.73% | 1.74% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | September 6, 2011 | February 20, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about XIN and FLUR
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XIN or FLUR?
As of September 2, 2026, XIN has returned 13.64% year to date, while FLUR has returned 15.16%. FLUR is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XIN or FLUR?
As of September 2, 2026, XIN manages $1.95 B in assets, while FLUR manages $623.82 M. XIN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XIN and FLUR managed?
XIN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. FLUR is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XIN and FLUR emphasize?
XIN is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. FLUR is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XIN or FLUR?
Year to date, XIN has seen +$138.91 M in net flows, compared with +$100.54 M for FLUR. XIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XIN and FLUR compare?
XIN has an expense ratio of 0.48%, while FLUR has an expense ratio of 0.10%.
What are the top holdings of XIN and FLUR?
XIN's largest holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG. FLUR's top holdings include ASML Holding NV, HSBC Holdings Plc, and Roche Holding AG.
Which ETF is more diversified: XIN or FLUR?
XIN holds 663 securities, while FLUR holds 684. On holdings count, FLUR is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XIN and FLUR
International Opportunities Expand in 2026
As global market leadership broadens beyond the United States, investors are increasingly revisiting international equities. Franklin International Equity Index ETF – FLUR offers diversified developed-market exposure aligned with shifting global opportunities.
Posted on 4/1/2026 by Franklin Templeton inGlobal
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.