VS
iShares Core MSCI All-International Equity Index ETF (XINT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (VI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XINT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Industrials, while VI leans towards Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XINT features a management fee (MER) of 0.23%, compared to 0.2% for VI. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XINT
VI
| AuM | $41.10 M | - |
| Management Fees | 0.23% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.34% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XINT | -1.22% | -1.62% | - | - | - |
VI | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Flows | XINT | +$11 M | +$40 M | - | - | - |
VI | - | - | - | - | - |
XINT vs VI exposure
Countries
XINT
Japan
17.06%
Taiwan
10.16%
United Kingdom
8.66%
Republic of Korea
7.28%
Other
56.84%
VI
Japan
24.23%
United Kingdom
11.66%
Republic of Korea
10.21%
Switzerland
7.70%
Other
46.19%
Sectors
XINT
Finance
24.63%
Technology
24.08%
Industrials
12.71%
Non-Energy Materials
7.54%
Healthcare
7.04%
Other
24.00%
VI
Finance
25.53%
Technology
18.21%
Industrials
15.35%
Healthcare
8.22%
Non-Energy Materials
7.26%
Other
25.43%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XINT
CA46434T1057
64.40%
CA46434U1021
35.44%
VI
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
3.16%
SK hynix, Inc.
2.60%
ASML Holding NV
2.41%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.18%
Roche Holding AG
1.01%
Shell Plc
0.95%
Novartis AG
0.92%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
0.88%
AstraZeneca PLC
0.84%
Nestlé SA
0.81%
Diversification
XINT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5,568 total
99.84%
VI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 3,675 total
14.77%
Characteristics
Compare
XINT
VI
| Provider | iShares | Vanguard |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex North America IMI Net Index - CAD | FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Hedged to CAD Net Tax Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 5, 2026 | December 1, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about XINT and VI
How do the fees of XINT and VI compare?
XINT has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while VI has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What sectors do XINT and VI emphasize?
XINT is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. VI is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
How are XINT and VI managed?
XINT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI ACWI ex North America IMI Net Index - CAD benchmark. VI is passively managed by Vanguard. It tracks the FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Hedged to CAD Net Tax Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XINT or VI?
XINT holds 1 securities, while VI holds 3596. On holdings count, VI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XINT and VI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.