VS
iShares Core MSCI All-International Equity Index ETF (XINT) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XINT focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Finance, Technology, and Industrials, while ZEA leans towards Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XINT features a management fee (MER) of 0.23%, compared to 0.2% for ZEA. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XINT
ZEA
| AuM | $41.10 M | $13,939.72 M |
| Management Fees | 0.23% | 0.20% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.34% | -0.36% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XINT | -1.22% | -1.62% | - | - | - |
ZEA | +1.31% | -0.97% | +14.70% | +14.50% | +69.97% | |
| Flows | XINT | +$11 M | +$40 M | - | - | - |
ZEA | +$7 M | +$440 M | +$1,182 M | +$1,358 M | +$3,154 M |
XINT vs ZEA exposure
Countries
XINT
Japan
17.06%
Taiwan
10.16%
United Kingdom
8.66%
Republic of Korea
7.28%
Other
56.84%
ZEA
Japan
26.51%
United Kingdom
13.43%
Switzerland
8.79%
Germany
7.81%
France
7.67%
Other
35.78%
Sectors
XINT
Finance
24.63%
Technology
24.08%
Industrials
12.71%
Non-Energy Materials
7.54%
Healthcare
7.04%
Other
24.00%
ZEA
Finance
27.00%
Industrials
16.12%
Technology
13.28%
Healthcare
9.07%
Non-Energy Materials
7.63%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.61%
Other
19.29%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XINT
CA46434T1057
64.40%
CA46434U1021
35.44%
ZEA
US46432F8427
100.00%
Diversification
XINT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5,568 total
99.84%
ZEA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,621 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
XINT
ZEA
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI ACWI ex North America IMI Net Index - CAD | MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | - | 1.92% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 5, 2026 | February 10, 2014 |
Frequently asked questions about XINT and ZEA
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XINT or ZEA?
As of November 11, 2026, XINT manages $41.10 M in assets, while ZEA manages $13.94 B. ZEA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XINT and ZEA managed?
XINT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI ACWI ex North America IMI Net Index - CAD benchmark. ZEA is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XINT or ZEA?
XINT holds 1 securities, while ZEA holds 1. On holdings count, XINT is the more diversified portfolio.
How do the fees of XINT and ZEA compare?
XINT has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while ZEA has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What sectors do XINT and ZEA emphasize?
XINT is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. ZEA is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Recent articles about XINT and ZEA
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.