VS
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA) and Harvest Global Gold Giants Index ETF (HGGG) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that XMA focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Non-Energy Materials and Business Services, while HGGG leans towards Non-Energy Materials. When evaluating costs, XMA features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.4% for HGGG. Performance-wise, XMA has returned 3.43% year-to-date with +$279 M in net flows, whereas HGGG is at 2.32% with +$11 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMA
HGGG
| AuM | $673.99 M | $63.83 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.40% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 0.68% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.43% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMA | -6.93% | +8.51% | +3.43% | +23.24% | +158.05% |
HGGG | -7.36% | +10.89% | -2.32% | +21.19% | +244.41% | |
| Flows | XMA | -$5 M | +$53 M | +$279 M | +$292 M | +$350 M |
HGGG | +$4 M | +$11 M | +$11 M | +$11 M | +$18 M |
XMA vs HGGG exposure
Countries
XMA
Canada
97.93%
HGGG
Canada
64.35%
USA
20.21%
Australia
8.85%
Sectors
XMA
Non-Energy Materials
98.57%
HGGG
Non-Energy Materials
98.25%
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMA
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
14.50%
Barrick Mining Corp.
10.56%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
9.62%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
7.13%
Kinross Gold Corp.
5.13%
Nutrien Ltd.
5.10%
Teck Resources Limited
4.30%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.16%
Pan American Silver Corp.
3.08%
Lundin Mining Corp.
2.54%
HGGG
SSR Mining, Inc.
5.26%
Eldorado Gold Corp.
5.17%
G Mining Ventures Corp.
5.10%
Lundin Gold, Inc.
5.09%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
5.09%
Equinox Gold Corp.
5.05%
Kinross Gold Corp.
5.05%
IAMGOLD Corp.
5.02%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
5.00%
Pan American Silver Corp.
5.00%
Diversification
XMA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 59 total
65.12%
HGGG
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 20 total
50.83%
Characteristics
Compare
XMA
HGGG
| Provider | iShares | Harvest Portfolios Group |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD | Solactive Global Gold Giants GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.52% | 0.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 19, 2005 | January 15, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about XMA and HGGG
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMA or HGGG?
As of October 28, 2026, XMA has returned 3.43% year to date, while HGGG has returned -2.32%. XMA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMA or HGGG?
As of October 28, 2026, XMA manages $673.99 M in assets, while HGGG manages $63.83 M. XMA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMA and HGGG managed?
XMA is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD benchmark. HGGG is passively managed by Harvest Portfolios Group. It tracks the Solactive Global Gold Giants GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XMA and HGGG emphasize?
XMA is most exposed to Non-Energy Materials and Business Services. HGGG is most exposed to Non-Energy Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMA or HGGG?
Year to date, XMA has seen +$278.83 M in net flows, compared with +$10.77 M for HGGG. XMA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMA and HGGG compare?
XMA has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while HGGG has an expense ratio of 0.68%.
What are the top holdings of XMA and HGGG?
XMA's largest holdings include Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., Barrick Mining Corp., and Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.. HGGG's top holdings include SSR Mining, Inc., Eldorado Gold Corp., and G Mining Ventures Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMA or HGGG?
XMA holds 59 securities, while HGGG holds 20. On holdings count, XMA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XMA and HGGG
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.