VS
When evaluating costs, XMA features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.5% for SLVX. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMA
SLVX
| AuM | $767.20 M | $28.27 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 0.50% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.49% | -0.55% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 1, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMA | +15.23% | +4.77% | +14.66% | +49.47% | +161.33% |
SLVX | +23.52% | +6.48% | - | - | - | |
| Flows | XMA | +$48 M | +$28 M | +$298 M | +$341 M | +$372 M |
SLVX | +$14 M | +$22 M | - | - | - |
XMA vs SLVX exposure
Countries
XMA
Canada
96.60%
SLVX
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
XMA
Non-Energy Materials
96.72%
SLVX
Exposure data will be available soon
As of September 1, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMA
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
13.31%
Barrick Mining Corp.
10.95%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp.
8.93%
Franco-Nevada Corp.
7.40%
Nutrien Ltd.
5.90%
Kinross Gold Corp.
4.89%
Teck Resources Limited
4.86%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd.
3.26%
Pan American Silver Corp.
3.22%
Lundin Mining Corp.
2.98%
SLVX
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
XMA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
65.71%
SLVX
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
XMA
SLVX
| Provider | iShares | Global X |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD | Solactive Global Silver Miners Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.41% | - |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 19, 2005 | May 12, 2022 |
Frequently asked questions about XMA and SLVX
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMA or SLVX?
As of September 1, 2026, XMA manages $767.20 M in assets, while SLVX manages $28.27 M. XMA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMA and SLVX managed?
XMA is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD benchmark. SLVX is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Solactive Global Silver Miners Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
How do the fees of XMA and SLVX compare?
XMA has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while SLVX has an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Recent articles about XMA and SLVX
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.