VS
Compare iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA) vs BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMA provides Materials exposures, while ZEB is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, XMA features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, XMA has returned 8.83% year-to-date with +$270 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 15.03% with -$1,114 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMA
ZEB
| AuM | $707.36 M | $5,154.86 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.75% | -0.67% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMA | -3.94% | -2.01% | +8.83% | +74.33% | +126.47% |
ZEB | +9.65% | +10.03% | +15.03% | +65.52% | +121.30% | |
| Flows | XMA | +$5 M | +$127 M | +$270 M | +$317 M | +$191 M |
ZEB | -$391 M | -$648 M | -$1,114 M | -$1,641 M | -$1,550 M |
XMA vs ZEB exposure
Countries
XMA
Canada
99.91%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
XMA
Materials
82.53%
Other
17.48%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of May 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMA
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
15.62%
CA06849F1080
10.52%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
9.16%
FRANCO NEVADA
7.33%
KINROSS GOLD
5.64%
NUTRIEN LTD
5.58%
TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
3.56%
PAN AMERICAN
3.55%
ALAMOS GOLD
2.87%
LUNDIN MINING
2.59%
ZEB
ROYAL BK CANADA
17.14%
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
BNS
16.62%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.48%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.40%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.33%
Diversification
XMA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
66.41%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
XMA
ZEB
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.37% | 2.62% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 19, 2005 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about XMA and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMA or ZEB?
As of May 6, 2026, XMA has returned 8.83% year to date, while ZEB has returned 15.03%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMA or ZEB?
As of May 6, 2026, XMA manages $707.36 M in assets, while ZEB manages $5.15 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMA and ZEB managed?
XMA is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XMA and ZEB emphasize?
XMA is most exposed to Materials. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMA or ZEB?
Year to date, XMA has seen +$269.86 M in net flows, compared with -$1,113.95 M for ZEB. XMA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMA and ZEB compare?
XMA has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of XMA and ZEB?
XMA's largest holdings include AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD and WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP. ZEB's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA, TORONTO DOMINION, and BNS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMA or ZEB?
XMA holds 48 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, XMA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XMA and ZEB
Defense Spending and Trade Reform Could Fuel These ETFs
Canada’s Bill C-5 clears trade barriers, boosting manufacturing ETFs.
Posted on 7/3/2025 by Kyle Anthony inDefense
Bank Stocks: An Undervalued Gem?
Bank stocks are poised for growth amid declining inflation and rate cuts.
Posted on 7/29/2024 by ETF Market Canada inBanks
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.