VS
Compare iShares S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index ETF (XMA) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMA provides Materials exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities. When evaluating costs, XMA features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, XMA has returned 8.83% year-to-date with +$270 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 16.08% with -$63 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMA
ZUT
| AuM | $707.36 M | $875.85 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.75% | -0.85% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 6, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMA | -3.94% | -2.01% | +8.83% | +74.33% | +126.47% |
ZUT | -1.06% | +11.27% | +16.08% | +29.45% | +38.54% | |
| Flows | XMA | +$5 M | +$127 M | +$270 M | +$317 M | +$191 M |
ZUT | +$24 M | -$35 M | -$63 M | +$131 M | +$310 M |
XMA vs ZUT exposure
Countries
XMA
Canada
99.91%
ZUT
Canada
85.16%
Bermuda
14.84%
Sectors
XMA
Materials
82.53%
Other
17.48%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of May 6, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMA
AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD
15.62%
CA06849F1080
10.52%
WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP
9.16%
FRANCO NEVADA
7.33%
KINROSS GOLD
5.64%
NUTRIEN LTD
5.58%
TECK RESOURCES LIMITED
3.56%
PAN AMERICAN
3.55%
ALAMOS GOLD
2.87%
LUNDIN MINING
2.59%
ZUT
BORALEX
9.91%
NORTHLAND POWER
7.97%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.84%
CAPITAL POWER
7.84%
ALTAGAS
7.70%
ATCO
7.53%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.52%
TRANSALTA
7.49%
EMERA
7.42%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.38%
Diversification
XMA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 60 total
66.41%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.61%
Characteristics
Compare
XMA
ZUT
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.37% | 2.89% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | December 19, 2005 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about XMA and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMA or ZUT?
As of May 6, 2026, XMA has returned 8.83% year to date, while ZUT has returned 16.08%. ZUT is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMA or ZUT?
As of May 6, 2026, XMA manages $707.36 M in assets, while ZUT manages $875.85 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMA and ZUT managed?
XMA is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Materials Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XMA and ZUT emphasize?
XMA is most exposed to Materials. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMA or ZUT?
Year to date, XMA has seen +$269.86 M in net flows, compared with -$63.05 M for ZUT. XMA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMA and ZUT compare?
XMA has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of XMA and ZUT?
XMA's largest holdings include AGNICO EAGLE MINES LTD and WHEATON PRECIOUS METALS CORP. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMA or ZUT?
XMA holds 48 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, XMA is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XMA and ZUT
Defense Spending and Trade Reform Could Fuel These ETFs
Canada’s Bill C-5 clears trade barriers, boosting manufacturing ETFs.
Posted on 7/3/2025 by Kyle Anthony inDefense
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.