XMC.U
iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF

Full XMC.U fund page
VS
FMID
Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (CA)

Full FMID fund page

Compare iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMC.U) vs Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (CA) (FMID) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMC.U provides Finance, Industrials, and Technology exposures, while FMID is primarily weighted in Finance, Healthcare, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XMC.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.3% for FMID. Performance-wise, XMC.U has returned 11.85% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas FMID is at 7.86% with +$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-3.0-2.0-1.00.01.0%Sep 2Sep 9Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 2, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XMC.U
-2.04%-3.32%+11.85%+13.02%+53.71%
FMID
-1.77%-1.48%+7.86%+5.44%-
Flows
XMC.U
-$1 M+$1 M+$3 M+$4 M+$28 M
FMID
+$0 M+$0 M+$2 M+$0 M-

XMC.U vs FMID exposure

Countries

XMC.U
USA
96.39%
FMID
USA
94.98%

Sectors

XMC.U
Finance
22.77%
Industrials
16.32%
Technology
14.41%
Non-Energy Materials
10.55%
Healthcare
10.25%
Other
25.70%
FMID
Finance
19.24%
Healthcare
15.73%
Industrials
13.91%
Technology
13.30%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.46%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.50%
Other
19.86%
As of October 2, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XMC.U
Twilio, Inc.
1.00%
Illumina, Inc.
0.91%
TechnipFMC plc
0.87%
Everpure, Inc.
0.82%
Okta, Inc.
0.81%
ATI, Inc.
0.78%
nVent Electric Plc
0.68%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.66%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.65%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.64%
FMID
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.37%
Paychex, Inc.
1.21%
The Allstate Corp.
1.18%
Garmin Ltd.
1.15%
Cencora, Inc.
1.14%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.12%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.09%
Fastenal Co.
1.08%
Arch Capital Group Ltd.
1.05%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc
1.05%

Diversification

XMC.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 401 total
7.83%
FMID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 204 total
11.45%

Characteristics

Compare
XMC.U
FMID
ProvideriSharesFranklin Templeton
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P MidCap 400 Index - CADLibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Total Return Index - USD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.95%1.17%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateOctober 22, 2019January 30, 2025

Frequently asked questions about XMC.U and FMID

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMC.U or FMID?
As of October 2, 2026, XMC.U has returned 11.85% year to date, while FMID has returned 7.86%. XMC.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMC.U or FMID?
As of October 2, 2026, XMC.U manages $39.42 M in assets, while FMID manages $12.29 M. XMC.U is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMC.U and FMID managed?
XMC.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD benchmark. FMID is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XMC.U and FMID emphasize?
XMC.U is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. FMID is most exposed to Finance, Healthcare, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMC.U or FMID?
Year to date, XMC.U has seen +$3.41 M in net flows, compared with +$1.94 M for FMID. XMC.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMC.U and FMID compare?
XMC.U has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while FMID has an expense ratio of 0.35%.
What are the top holdings of XMC.U and FMID?
XMC.U's largest holdings include Twilio, Inc., Illumina, Inc., and TechnipFMC plc. FMID's top holdings include Expedia Group, Inc., Paychex, Inc., and The Allstate Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMC.U or FMID?
XMC.U holds 401 securities, while FMID holds 201. On holdings count, XMC.U is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XMC.U and FMID

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds