VS
Compare iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMC.U) vs BMO S&P US Mid Cap Index ETF (ZMID.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMC.U and ZMID.F provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XMC.U features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.15% for ZMID.F. Performance-wise, XMC.U has returned 10.8% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZMID.F is at 8.85% with +$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMC.U
ZMID.F
| AuM | $26.76 M | $11.58 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.16% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | 0.82% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 1, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMC.U | -2.30% | -4.23% | +10.80% | +12.10% | +52.27% |
ZMID.F | -2.51% | -4.71% | +8.85% | +9.57% | +44.54% | |
| Flows | XMC.U | -$1 M | +$0 M | +$2 M | +$2 M | +$19 M |
ZMID.F | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$0 M | +$8 M |
XMC.U vs ZMID.F exposure
Countries
XMC.U
USA
96.39%
ZMID.F
USA
96.47%
Sectors
XMC.U
Finance
22.77%
Industrials
16.32%
Technology
14.41%
Non-Energy Materials
10.55%
Healthcare
10.25%
Other
25.70%
ZMID.F
Finance
22.84%
Industrials
16.36%
Technology
14.33%
Non-Energy Materials
10.70%
Healthcare
10.22%
Other
25.55%
As of October 1, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMC.U
Twilio, Inc.
1.00%
Illumina, Inc.
0.91%
TechnipFMC plc
0.87%
Everpure, Inc.
0.82%
Okta, Inc.
0.81%
ATI, Inc.
0.78%
nVent Electric Plc
0.68%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.66%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.65%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.64%
ZMID.F
Twilio, Inc.
1.02%
Illumina, Inc.
0.90%
TechnipFMC plc
0.84%
Everpure, Inc.
0.83%
ATI, Inc.
0.81%
Okta, Inc.
0.78%
nVent Electric Plc
0.67%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.66%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.65%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.64%
Diversification
XMC.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 401 total
7.83%
ZMID.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 400 total
7.80%
Characteristics
Compare
XMC.U
ZMID.F
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD | S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD Hedged |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.96% | 0.98% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 22, 2019 | February 5, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about XMC.U and ZMID.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMC.U or ZMID.F?
As of October 1, 2026, XMC.U has returned 10.80% year to date, while ZMID.F has returned 8.85%. XMC.U is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMC.U or ZMID.F?
As of October 1, 2026, XMC.U manages $26.76 M in assets, while ZMID.F manages $11.58 M. XMC.U is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMC.U and ZMID.F managed?
XMC.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD benchmark. ZMID.F is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD Hedged benchmark.
What sectors do XMC.U and ZMID.F emphasize?
XMC.U is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. ZMID.F is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMC.U or ZMID.F?
Year to date, XMC.U has seen +$1.73 M in net flows, compared with +$0.02 M for ZMID.F. XMC.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMC.U and ZMID.F compare?
XMC.U has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while ZMID.F has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of XMC.U and ZMID.F?
XMC.U's largest holdings include Twilio, Inc., Illumina, Inc., and TechnipFMC plc. ZMID.F's top holdings include Twilio, Inc., Illumina, Inc., and TechnipFMC plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMC.U or ZMID.F?
XMC.U holds 401 securities, while ZMID.F holds 400. On holdings count, XMC.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XMC.U and ZMID.F
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.