VS
Compare iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMH) vs Desjardins American Mid Cap Equity Index ETF (DMID) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMH and DMID provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XMH features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.1% for DMID. Performance-wise, XMH has returned 11.93% year-to-date with +$176 M in net flows, whereas DMID is at 15.4% with +$30 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMH
DMID
| AuM | $588.82 M | $481.83 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.10% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.16% | 0.02% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.17% | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMH | +1.85% | -4.19% | +11.93% | +13.23% | +50.87% |
DMID | +3.26% | -1.34% | +15.40% | +13.64% | - | |
| Flows | XMH | +$21 M | -$21 M | +$176 M | +$159 M | +$376 M |
DMID | +$20 M | +$58 M | +$30 M | +$62 M | - |
XMH vs DMID exposure
Countries
XMH
USA
96.19%
DMID
USA
94.71%
Sectors
XMH
Finance
22.43%
Industrials
16.46%
Technology
15.76%
Non-Energy Materials
10.10%
Healthcare
10.06%
Other
25.20%
DMID
Finance
22.07%
Industrials
16.56%
Technology
14.98%
Healthcare
13.64%
Non-Energy Materials
8.53%
Other
24.22%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMH
US4642875078
99.93%
DMID
Guardant Health, Inc.
0.60%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.58%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.55%
Viatris, Inc.
0.54%
Roku, Inc.
0.54%
Coeur Mining, Inc.
0.52%
Snap-On, Inc.
0.50%
TD SYNNEX Corp.
0.49%
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
0.49%
ITT, Inc.
0.47%
Diversification
XMH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 401 total
99.93%
DMID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 395 total
5.28%
Characteristics
Compare
XMH
DMID
| Provider | iShares | Desjardins Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive GBS United States 400 CAD Index (CA NTR) - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.93% | 1.05% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 4, 2015 | August 28, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about XMH and DMID
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMH or DMID?
As of November 11, 2026, XMH has returned 11.93% year to date, while DMID has returned 15.40%. DMID is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMH or DMID?
As of November 11, 2026, XMH manages $588.82 M in assets, while DMID manages $481.83 M. XMH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMH and DMID managed?
XMH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. DMID is passively managed by Desjardins Investments. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 400 CAD Index (CA NTR) - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMH or DMID?
XMH holds 1 securities, while DMID holds 391. On holdings count, DMID is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMH or DMID?
Year to date, XMH has seen +$175.70 M in net flows, compared with +$29.62 M for DMID. XMH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMH and DMID compare?
XMH has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while DMID has an expense ratio of 0.02%.
What sectors do XMH and DMID emphasize?
XMH is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. DMID is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Recent articles about XMH and DMID
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.