VS
Compare iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMH) vs Franklin U.S. Mid Cap Multifactor Index ETF (CA) (FMID) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMH provides Finance, Industrials, and Technology exposures, while FMID is primarily weighted in Finance, Healthcare, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XMH features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.3% for FMID. Performance-wise, XMH has returned 11.93% year-to-date with +$176 M in net flows, whereas FMID is at 17.54% with -$0 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMH
FMID
| AuM | $588.82 M | $11.16 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.30% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.16% | 0.35% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.17% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMH | +1.85% | -4.19% | +11.93% | +13.23% | +50.87% |
FMID | +7.02% | +5.39% | +17.54% | +16.31% | - | |
| Flows | XMH | +$21 M | -$21 M | +$176 M | +$159 M | +$376 M |
FMID | -$2 M | -$2 M | -$0 M | -$0 M | - |
XMH vs FMID exposure
Countries
XMH
USA
96.19%
FMID
USA
94.94%
Sectors
XMH
Finance
22.43%
Industrials
16.46%
Technology
15.76%
Non-Energy Materials
10.10%
Healthcare
10.06%
Other
25.20%
FMID
Finance
19.15%
Healthcare
16.28%
Industrials
14.03%
Technology
13.78%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
10.40%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.51%
Other
18.85%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMH
US4642875078
99.93%
FMID
Garmin Ltd.
1.25%
Prudential Financial, Inc.
1.18%
Expedia Group, Inc.
1.16%
NetApp, Inc.
1.15%
Fastenal Co.
1.13%
Cencora, Inc.
1.13%
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.13%
Waters Corp.
1.11%
The Allstate Corp.
1.09%
HP, Inc.
1.08%
Diversification
XMH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 401 total
99.93%
FMID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 204 total
11.40%
Characteristics
Compare
XMH
FMID
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.93% | 1.08% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 4, 2015 | January 30, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about XMH and FMID
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMH or FMID?
As of November 11, 2026, XMH has returned 11.93% year to date, while FMID has returned 17.54%. FMID is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMH or FMID?
As of November 11, 2026, XMH manages $588.82 M in assets, while FMID manages $11.16 M. XMH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMH and FMID managed?
XMH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. FMID is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the LibertyQ US Mid Cap Equity Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMH or FMID?
XMH holds 1 securities, while FMID holds 201. On holdings count, FMID is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMH or FMID?
Year to date, XMH has seen +$175.70 M in net flows, compared with -$0.20 M for FMID. XMH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMH and FMID compare?
XMH has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while FMID has an expense ratio of 0.35%.
What sectors do XMH and FMID emphasize?
XMH is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. FMID is most exposed to Finance, Healthcare, and Industrials.
Recent articles about XMH and FMID
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.