VS
Compare iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMH) vs Manulife Multifactor U.S. Mid Cap Index ETF (MUMC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMH provides Finance, Industrials, and Technology exposures, while MUMC is primarily weighted in Finance, Technology, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, XMH features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.5% for MUMC. Performance-wise, XMH has returned 11.93% year-to-date with +$176 M in net flows, whereas MUMC is at 12.85% with +$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMH
MUMC
| AuM | $588.82 M | $24.05 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.50% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.16% | 0.56% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.17% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMH | +1.85% | -4.19% | +11.93% | +13.23% | +50.87% |
MUMC | +2.35% | -2.65% | +12.85% | +13.18% | +56.55% | |
| Flows | XMH | +$21 M | -$21 M | +$176 M | +$159 M | +$376 M |
MUMC | +$0 M | -$0 M | +$12 M | +$12 M | +$8 M |
XMH vs MUMC exposure
Countries
XMH
USA
96.19%
MUMC
USA
95.05%
Sectors
XMH
Finance
22.43%
Industrials
16.46%
Technology
15.76%
Non-Energy Materials
10.10%
Healthcare
10.06%
Other
25.20%
MUMC
Finance
22.04%
Technology
15.78%
Industrials
15.45%
Healthcare
13.38%
Non-Energy Materials
7.71%
Other
25.64%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMH
US4642875078
99.93%
MUMC
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.64%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.57%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.55%
AMETEK, Inc.
0.51%
Coherent Corp.
0.49%
Flex Ltd.
0.49%
State Street Corp.
0.48%
eBay, Inc.
0.47%
Twilio, Inc.
0.46%
Devon Energy Corp.
0.45%
Diversification
XMH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 401 total
99.93%
MUMC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 655 total
5.10%
Characteristics
Compare
XMH
MUMC
| Provider | iShares | Manulife Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.93% | 0.34% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 4, 2015 | March 23, 2017 |
Frequently asked questions about XMH and MUMC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMH or MUMC?
As of November 11, 2026, XMH has returned 11.93% year to date, while MUMC has returned 12.85%. MUMC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMH or MUMC?
As of November 11, 2026, XMH manages $588.82 M in assets, while MUMC manages $24.05 M. XMH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMH and MUMC managed?
XMH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. MUMC is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XMH or MUMC?
XMH holds 1 securities, while MUMC holds 649. On holdings count, MUMC is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMH or MUMC?
Year to date, XMH has seen +$175.70 M in net flows, compared with +$12.29 M for MUMC. XMH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMH and MUMC compare?
XMH has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while MUMC has an expense ratio of 0.56%.
What sectors do XMH and MUMC emphasize?
XMH is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. MUMC is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials.
Recent articles about XMH and MUMC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.