XMH
iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF

Full XMH fund page
VS
MUMC.B
Manulife Multifactor U.S. Mid Cap Index ETF

Full MUMC.B fund page

Compare iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMH) vs Manulife Multifactor U.S. Mid Cap Index ETF (MUMC.B) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMH and MUMC.B provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XMH features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.45% for MUMC.B. Performance-wise, XMH has returned 15.67% year-to-date with +$200 M in net flows, whereas MUMC.B is at 17.21% with +$9 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0.01.02.03.04.05.0%Jul 20Jul 27Aug 4Aug 11Aug 18

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of August 19, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XMH
+2.64%+7.74%+15.67%+19.59%+47.26%
MUMC.B
+2.08%+8.90%+17.21%+20.57%+61.91%
Flows
XMH
+$1 M+$96 M+$200 M+$197 M+$401 M
MUMC.B
+$0 M+$0 M+$9 M+$9 M+$29 M

XMH vs MUMC.B exposure

Countries

XMH
USA
96.02%
MUMC.B
USA
94.71%

Sectors

XMH
Finance
21.88%
Industrials
18.64%
Technology
15.28%
Non-Energy Materials
10.61%
Healthcare
8.50%
Other
25.09%
MUMC.B
Finance
21.67%
Industrials
17.26%
Technology
16.39%
Healthcare
10.64%
Non-Energy Materials
7.62%
Other
26.42%
As of August 19, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XMH
Twilio, Inc.
0.86%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.84%
MKS, Inc.
0.82%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.77%
Entegris, Inc.
0.75%
nVent Electric Plc
0.75%
ATI, Inc.
0.74%
Illumina, Inc.
0.73%
TechnipFMC plc
0.72%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.71%
MUMC.B
Flex Ltd.
0.85%
Teradyne, Inc.
0.65%
Comfort Systems USA, Inc.
0.64%
Coherent Corp.
0.64%
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co.
0.60%
Keysight Technologies, Inc.
0.58%
MKS, Inc.
0.55%
Ciena Corp.
0.53%
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
0.52%
Targa Resources Corp.
0.52%

Diversification

XMH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 404 total
7.68%
MUMC.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 660 total
6.08%

Characteristics

Compare
XMH
MUMC.B
ProvideriSharesManulife Investments
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CADJohn Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Total Return Index - USD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.90%0.29%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateAugust 4, 2015March 23, 2017

Frequently asked questions about XMH and MUMC.B

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMH or MUMC.B?
As of August 19, 2026, XMH has returned 15.67% year to date, while MUMC.B has returned 17.21%. MUMC.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMH or MUMC.B?
As of August 19, 2026, XMH manages $633.60 M in assets, while MUMC.B manages $79.77 M. XMH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMH and MUMC.B managed?
XMH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. MUMC.B is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Mid Cap Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do XMH and MUMC.B emphasize?
XMH is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. MUMC.B is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMH or MUMC.B?
Year to date, XMH has seen +$199.74 M in net flows, compared with +$8.79 M for MUMC.B. XMH has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMH and MUMC.B compare?
XMH has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while MUMC.B has an expense ratio of 0.51%.
What are the top holdings of XMH and MUMC.B?
XMH's largest holdings include Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp., and MKS, Inc.. MUMC.B's top holdings include Flex Ltd., Teradyne, Inc., and Comfort Systems USA, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMH or MUMC.B?
XMH holds 404 securities, while MUMC.B holds 652. On holdings count, MUMC.B is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XMH and MUMC.B

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds