VS
Compare iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMH) vs iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMH and XMC provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XMH features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.15% for XMC. Performance-wise, XMH has returned 17.83% year-to-date with +$200 M in net flows, whereas XMC is at 20.69% with +$212 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XMH
XMC
| AuM | $645.40 M | $901.84 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.15% | 0.16% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.17% | 0.18% |
Historical performance and flows
As of August 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XMH | +3.71% | +9.74% | +17.83% | +22.04% | +50.56% |
XMC | +2.80% | +10.80% | +20.69% | +24.81% | +61.83% | |
| Flows | XMH | +$0 M | +$96 M | +$200 M | +$197 M | +$401 M |
XMC | +$24 M | +$52 M | +$212 M | +$236 M | +$549 M |
XMH vs XMC exposure
Countries
XMH
USA
96.02%
XMC
USA
96.02%
Sectors
XMH
Finance
21.88%
Industrials
18.64%
Technology
15.28%
Non-Energy Materials
10.61%
Healthcare
8.50%
Other
25.09%
XMC
Finance
21.88%
Industrials
18.64%
Technology
15.28%
Non-Energy Materials
10.61%
Healthcare
8.50%
Other
25.09%
As of August 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XMH
Twilio, Inc.
0.86%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.84%
MKS, Inc.
0.82%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.77%
Entegris, Inc.
0.75%
nVent Electric Plc
0.75%
ATI, Inc.
0.74%
Illumina, Inc.
0.73%
TechnipFMC plc
0.72%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.71%
XMC
Twilio, Inc.
0.86%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.84%
MKS, Inc.
0.82%
Curtiss-Wright Corp.
0.77%
nVent Electric Plc
0.75%
Entegris, Inc.
0.75%
ATI, Inc.
0.74%
Illumina, Inc.
0.73%
TechnipFMC plc
0.72%
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
0.71%
Diversification
XMH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 404 total
7.68%
XMC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 404 total
7.68%
Characteristics
Compare
XMH
XMC
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD | S&P MidCap 400 Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.88% | 0.89% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | August 4, 2015 | August 4, 2015 |
Frequently asked questions about XMH and XMC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMH or XMC?
As of August 17, 2026, XMH has returned 17.83% year to date, while XMC has returned 20.69%. XMC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMH or XMC?
As of August 17, 2026, XMH manages $645.40 M in assets, while XMC manages $901.84 M. XMC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMH and XMC managed?
XMH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XMC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XMH and XMC emphasize?
XMH is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. XMC is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMH or XMC?
Year to date, XMH has seen +$199.74 M in net flows, compared with +$212.20 M for XMC. XMC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMH and XMC compare?
XMH has an expense ratio of 0.15%, while XMC has an expense ratio of 0.16%.
What are the top holdings of XMH and XMC?
XMH's largest holdings include Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp., and MKS, Inc.. XMC's top holdings include Twilio, Inc., Carpenter Technology Corp., and MKS, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMH or XMC?
XMH holds 404 securities, while XMC holds 404. On holdings count, XMH is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XMH and XMC
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.