XMTM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF

Full XMTM fund page
VS
FLUS
Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (CA)

Full FLUS fund page

Compare iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor Index ETF (XMTM) vs Franklin U.S. Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (CA) (FLUS) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XMTM provides Technology, Industrials, and Energy exposures, while FLUS is primarily weighted in Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XMTM features a management fee (MER) of 0.3%, compared to 0.25% for FLUS. Performance-wise, XMTM has returned 21.78% year-to-date with +$1 M in net flows, whereas FLUS is at 14.05% with +$5 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 15, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XMTM
-6.53%-10.49%+21.78%+19.31%+118.03%
FLUS
-2.16%-1.26%+14.05%+16.38%+84.46%
Flows
XMTM
+$0 M-$4 M+$1 M-$3 M+$17 M
FLUS
+$0 M-$7 M+$5 M+$22 M+$40 M

XMTM vs FLUS exposure

Countries

XMTM
USA
96.50%
FLUS
USA
99.66%

Sectors

XMTM
Technology
50.64%
Industrials
14.94%
Energy
11.70%
Other
22.72%
FLUS
Technology
45.74%
Finance
12.59%
Healthcare
10.83%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.20%
Industrials
8.08%
Other
14.57%
As of September 15, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XMTM
Micron Technology, Inc.
6.25%
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
5.22%
Broadcom Inc.
4.71%
Intel Corp.
4.11%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
3.81%
Caterpillar, Inc.
3.63%
Johnson & Johnson
3.54%
Lam Research Corp.
3.15%
Applied Materials, Inc.
3.07%
GE Vernova, Inc.
3.05%
FLUS
Apple, Inc.
8.22%
NVIDIA Corp.
6.78%
Microsoft Corp.
4.09%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.53%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.06%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.87%
Broadcom Inc.
2.57%
Johnson & Johnson
2.00%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp.
2.00%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.97%

Diversification

XMTM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 127 total
40.54%
FLUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 215 total
37.09%

Characteristics

Compare
XMTM
FLUS
ProvideriSharesFranklin Templeton
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkMSCI USA Momentum NTR Index - CADLibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Net Tax Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.52%0.62%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 10, 2019May 6, 2017

Frequently asked questions about XMTM and FLUS

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XMTM or FLUS?
As of September 15, 2026, XMTM has returned 21.78% year to date, while FLUS has returned 14.05%. XMTM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XMTM or FLUS?
As of September 15, 2026, XMTM manages $30.36 M in assets, while FLUS manages $131.36 M. FLUS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XMTM and FLUS managed?
XMTM is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Momentum NTR Index - CAD benchmark. FLUS is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the LibertyQ US Large Cap Equity Net Tax Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XMTM and FLUS emphasize?
XMTM is most exposed to Technology, Industrials, and Energy. FLUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XMTM or FLUS?
Year to date, XMTM has seen +$1.41 M in net flows, compared with +$5.18 M for FLUS. FLUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XMTM and FLUS compare?
XMTM has an expense ratio of 0.31%, while FLUS has an expense ratio of 0.29%.
What are the top holdings of XMTM and FLUS?
XMTM's largest holdings include Micron Technology, Inc., Advanced Micro Devices, Inc., and Broadcom Inc.. FLUS's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XMTM or FLUS?
XMTM holds 126 securities, while FLUS holds 214. On holdings count, FLUS is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XMTM and FLUS

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds