XSMH
iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF

Full XSMH fund page
VS
MUSC
Manulife Multifactor U.S. Small Cap Index ETF

Full MUSC fund page

Compare iShares S&P U.S. Small-Cap Index ETF (XSMH) vs Manulife Multifactor U.S. Small Cap Index ETF (MUSC) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XSMH provides Finance, Technology, and Industrials exposures, while MUSC is primarily weighted in Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, XSMH features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.5% for MUSC. Performance-wise, XSMH has returned 13.67% year-to-date with -$20 M in net flows, whereas MUSC is at 9.92% with -$2 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.0-1.5-1.0-0.50.00.5%Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15Oct 22

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 23, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
XSMH
-0.20%-4.90%+13.67%+13.77%+52.95%
MUSC
+0.49%-3.60%+9.92%+10.06%+49.77%
Flows
XSMH
-$6 M-$5 M-$20 M-$26 M+$26 M
MUSC
-$2 M-$2 M-$2 M-$2 M+$0 M

XSMH vs MUSC exposure

Countries

XSMH
USA
99.70%
MUSC
USA
96.62%

Sectors

XSMH
Finance
26.23%
Technology
12.84%
Industrials
12.26%
Healthcare
10.93%
Consumer Cyclicals
7.86%
Other
29.88%
MUSC
Finance
25.91%
Industrials
12.57%
Technology
11.65%
Healthcare
9.36%
Non-Energy Materials
8.57%
Consumer Cyclicals
8.17%
Other
23.77%
As of October 23, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

XSMH
BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury
2.11%
Corcept Therapeutics, Inc.
0.60%
Glaukos Corp.
0.59%
Paycom Software, Inc.
0.55%
Brinker International, Inc.
0.55%
Match Group, Inc.
0.53%
Jackson Financial, Inc.
0.52%
ViaSat, Inc.
0.51%
Protagonist Therapeutics, Inc.
0.50%
CarMax, Inc.
0.49%
MUSC
Arrow Electronics, Inc.
0.58%
Littelfuse, Inc.
0.55%
Krystal Biotech, Inc.
0.54%
Darling Ingredients, Inc.
0.54%
Affiliated Managers Group, Inc.
0.50%
SM Energy Co.
0.49%
Ryder System, Inc.
0.48%
Unity Software, Inc.
0.48%
Voya Financial, Inc.
0.48%
Jackson Financial, Inc.
0.47%

Diversification

XSMH
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 603 total
6.94%
MUSC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 495 total
5.10%

Characteristics

Compare
XSMH
MUSC
ProvideriSharesManulife Investments
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P SmallCap 600 Index - CAD HedgedJohn Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index Total Return Hedged to CAD - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.98%1.24%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateSeptember 10, 2019November 27, 2017

Frequently asked questions about XSMH and MUSC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: XSMH or MUSC?
As of October 23, 2026, XSMH has returned 13.67% year to date, while MUSC has returned 9.92%. XSMH is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XSMH or MUSC?
As of October 23, 2026, XSMH manages $50.61 M in assets, while MUSC manages $1.94 M. XSMH is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XSMH and MUSC managed?
XSMH is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Index - CAD Hedged benchmark. MUSC is passively managed by Manulife Investments. It tracks the John Hancock Dimensional Small Cap Index Total Return Hedged to CAD - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XSMH and MUSC emphasize?
XSMH is most exposed to Finance, Technology, and Industrials. MUSC is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XSMH or MUSC?
Year to date, XSMH has seen -$20.41 M in net flows, compared with -$1.90 M for MUSC. MUSC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XSMH and MUSC compare?
XSMH has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while MUSC has an expense ratio of 0.55%.
What are the top holdings of XSMH and MUSC?
XSMH's largest holdings include BlackRock Cash Funds - Treasury, Corcept Therapeutics, Inc., and Glaukos Corp.. MUSC's top holdings include Arrow Electronics, Inc., Littelfuse, Inc., and Krystal Biotech, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XSMH or MUSC?
XSMH holds 601 securities, while MUSC holds 492. On holdings count, XSMH is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about XSMH and MUSC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds