VS
Compare iShares ESG MSCI USA Index ETF (XSUS) vs Mackenzie US Large Cap Equity Index ETF (QUU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XSUS and QUU provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XSUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.06% for QUU. Performance-wise, XSUS has returned 13.95% year-to-date with +$48 M in net flows, whereas QUU is at 12.68% with +$1 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XSUS
QUU
| AuM | $726.28 M | $6,855.38 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.06% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.23% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.08% | -0.08% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 10, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XSUS | -1.47% | +2.66% | +13.95% | +17.53% | +77.43% |
QUU | -2.71% | +3.92% | +12.68% | +16.98% | +79.98% | |
| Flows | XSUS | -$6 M | -$3 M | +$48 M | +$43 M | +$66 M |
QUU | +$556 M | +$746 M | +$1,259 M | +$1,784 M | +$2,282 M |
XSUS vs QUU exposure
Countries
XSUS
USA
96.92%
QUU
USA
97.61%
Sectors
XSUS
Technology
44.82%
Finance
14.23%
Healthcare
9.75%
Industrials
8.14%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.85%
Other
15.21%
QUU
Technology
44.66%
Finance
13.65%
Healthcare
9.19%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.78%
Industrials
8.19%
Other
15.53%
As of September 10, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XSUS
Apple, Inc.
7.50%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.02%
Microsoft Corp.
4.97%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.48%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.37%
Broadcom Inc.
2.73%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.03%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.72%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.51%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.44%
QUU
Apple, Inc.
7.42%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.09%
Microsoft Corp.
5.15%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.52%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.02%
Broadcom Inc.
2.80%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.63%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.84%
Tesla, Inc.
1.61%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.53%
Diversification
XSUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 276 total
35.79%
QUU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 507 total
36.62%
Characteristics
Compare
XSUS
QUU
| Provider | iShares | Mackenzie Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI USA Extended ESG focus NTR index - CAD | Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.71% | 0.88% |
| Meets ESG criteria | Yes | No |
| Inception Date | March 18, 2019 | January 24, 2018 |
Frequently asked questions about XSUS and QUU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XSUS or QUU?
As of September 10, 2026, XSUS has returned 13.95% year to date, while QUU has returned 12.68%. XSUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XSUS or QUU?
As of September 10, 2026, XSUS manages $726.28 M in assets, while QUU manages $6.86 B. QUU is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XSUS and QUU managed?
XSUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the MSCI USA Extended ESG focus NTR index - CAD benchmark. QUU is passively managed by Mackenzie Investments. It tracks the Solactive US Large Cap Index NTR - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XSUS and QUU emphasize?
XSUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. QUU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XSUS or QUU?
Year to date, XSUS has seen +$48.04 M in net flows, compared with +$1,259.48 M for QUU. QUU has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XSUS and QUU compare?
XSUS has an expense ratio of 0.23%, while QUU has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What are the top holdings of XSUS and QUU?
XSUS's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. QUU's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XSUS or QUU?
XSUS holds 275 securities, while QUU holds 502. On holdings count, QUU is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XSUS and QUU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.