VS
Compare iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS) vs Desjardins American Equity Index ETF (DMEU) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XUS and DMEU provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.05% for DMEU. Performance-wise, XUS has returned 16.72% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas DMEU is at 16.47% with +$2 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUS
DMEU
| AuM | $13,853.02 M | $4,694.32 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.24% | -0.25% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 28, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUS | -0.04% | +3.97% | +16.72% | +14.23% | +94.54% |
DMEU | -0.16% | +4.09% | +16.47% | +13.76% | - | |
| Flows | XUS | +$183 M | +$428 M | +$1,701 M | +$2,252 M | +$4,147 M |
DMEU | +$226 M | +$544 M | +$1,698 M | +$1,912 M | - |
XUS vs DMEU exposure
Countries
XUS
USA
97.51%
DMEU
USA
97.39%
Sectors
XUS
Technology
45.18%
Finance
13.61%
Healthcare
9.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Industrials
7.45%
Other
15.82%
DMEU
Technology
45.22%
Finance
13.33%
Healthcare
9.27%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.82%
Industrials
7.48%
Other
15.88%
As of October 28, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUS
US4642872000
99.95%
DMEU
NVIDIA Corp.
7.74%
Apple, Inc.
6.82%
Microsoft Corp.
5.60%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.76%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.98%
Broadcom Inc.
2.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.57%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.89%
Tesla, Inc.
1.69%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Diversification
XUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
99.95%
DMEU
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 505 total
37.28%
Characteristics
Compare
XUS
DMEU
| Provider | iShares | Desjardins Investments |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.10% | 0.80% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 10, 2013 | April 18, 2024 |
Frequently asked questions about XUS and DMEU
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUS or DMEU?
As of October 28, 2026, XUS has returned 16.72% year to date, while DMEU has returned 16.47%. XUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUS or DMEU?
As of October 28, 2026, XUS manages $13.85 B in assets, while DMEU manages $4.69 B. XUS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUS and DMEU managed?
XUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. DMEU is passively managed by Desjardins Investments. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 500 CAD Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: XUS or DMEU?
XUS holds 1 securities, while DMEU holds 500. On holdings count, DMEU is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUS or DMEU?
Year to date, XUS has seen +$1,701.16 M in net flows, compared with +$1,698.31 M for DMEU. XUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUS and DMEU compare?
XUS has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while DMEU has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What sectors do XUS and DMEU emphasize?
XUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. DMEU is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Recent articles about XUS and DMEU
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.