VS
Compare iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS) vs iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XUS and XUS.U provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.08% for XUS.U. Performance-wise, XUS has returned 16.21% year-to-date with +$2 B in net flows, whereas XUS.U is at 12.66% with +$64 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUS
XUS.U
| AuM | $13,779.05 M | $566.06 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.24% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUS | +2.93% | +2.63% | +16.21% | +17.39% | +87.23% |
XUS.U | +1.45% | +1.86% | +12.66% | +16.56% | +80.52% | |
| Flows | XUS | +$191 M | +$473 M | +$1,688 M | +$1,887 M | +$4,148 M |
XUS.U | +$7 M | +$19 M | +$64 M | +$75 M | +$248 M |
XUS vs XUS.U exposure
Countries
XUS
USA
97.51%
XUS.U
USA
97.51%
Sectors
XUS
Technology
45.18%
Finance
13.61%
Healthcare
9.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Industrials
7.45%
Other
15.82%
XUS.U
Technology
45.18%
Finance
13.61%
Healthcare
9.07%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.87%
Industrials
7.45%
Other
15.82%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUS
NVIDIA Corp.
8.06%
Apple, Inc.
7.02%
Microsoft Corp.
5.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.83%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Broadcom Inc.
2.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.39%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Tesla, Inc.
1.56%
XUS.U
NVIDIA Corp.
8.06%
Apple, Inc.
7.02%
Microsoft Corp.
5.68%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.83%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.00%
Broadcom Inc.
2.64%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.39%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.90%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.63%
Tesla, Inc.
1.56%
Diversification
XUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
37.72%
XUS.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
37.72%
Characteristics
Compare
XUS
XUS.U
| Provider | iShares | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.10% | 1.12% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 10, 2013 | October 9, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about XUS and XUS.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUS or XUS.U?
As of October 16, 2026, XUS has returned 16.21% year to date, while XUS.U has returned 12.66%. XUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUS or XUS.U?
As of October 16, 2026, XUS manages $13.78 B in assets, while XUS.U manages $566.06 M. XUS is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUS and XUS.U managed?
XUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XUS.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XUS and XUS.U emphasize?
XUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. XUS.U is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUS or XUS.U?
Year to date, XUS has seen +$1,687.79 M in net flows, compared with +$63.74 M for XUS.U. XUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUS and XUS.U compare?
XUS has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while XUS.U has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What are the top holdings of XUS and XUS.U?
XUS's largest holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp.. XUS.U's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUS or XUS.U?
XUS holds 501 securities, while XUS.U holds 501. On holdings count, XUS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XUS and XUS.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.