Compare iShares Core S&P 500 Index ETF (XUS) vs BMO S&P 500 Index ETF (ZSP) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XUS and ZSP provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XUS features a management fee (MER) of 0.08%, compared to 0.08% for ZSP. Performance-wise, XUS has returned 13.88% year-to-date with +$1 B in net flows, whereas ZSP is at 13.58% with +$452 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUS
ZSP
| AuM | $13,252.84 M | $24,332.28 M |
| Management Fees | 0.08% | 0.08% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.27% | -0.25% |
Historical performance and flows
As of September 2, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUS | -2.24% | +1.09% | +13.88% | +21.11% | +78.56% |
ZSP | -2.43% | +0.98% | +13.58% | +21.06% | +78.34% | |
| Flows | XUS | +$146 M | +$458 M | +$1,432 M | +$1,802 M | +$3,609 M |
ZSP | +$57 M | +$200 M | +$452 M | +$896 M | +$5,264 M |
XUS vs ZSP exposure
Countries
XUS
USA
96.39%
ZSP
USA
96.51%
Sectors
XUS
Technology
44.71%
Finance
14.00%
Healthcare
8.98%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.93%
Industrials
7.58%
Other
15.80%
ZSP
Technology
44.85%
Finance
14.06%
Healthcare
8.98%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.97%
Industrials
7.63%
Other
15.53%
As of September 2, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUS
Apple, Inc.
7.64%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.37%
Microsoft Corp.
5.23%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.60%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.05%
Broadcom Inc.
2.86%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.46%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.85%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.54%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.47%
ZSP
Apple, Inc.
7.66%
NVIDIA Corp.
7.39%
Microsoft Corp.
5.24%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.61%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.07%
Broadcom Inc.
2.88%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.47%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.85%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.55%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.47%
Diversification
XUS
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 504 total
37.06%
ZSP
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 502 total
37.19%
Characteristics
Compare
XUS
ZSP
| Provider | iShares | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD | S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.12% | 0.76% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | April 10, 2013 | November 14, 2012 |
Frequently asked questions about XUS and ZSP
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUS or ZSP?
As of September 2, 2026, XUS has returned 13.88% year to date, while ZSP has returned 13.58%. XUS is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUS or ZSP?
As of September 2, 2026, XUS manages $13.25 B in assets, while ZSP manages $24.33 B. ZSP is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUS and ZSP managed?
XUS is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. ZSP is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P 500 CAD Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XUS and ZSP emphasize?
XUS is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. ZSP is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUS or ZSP?
Year to date, XUS has seen +$1,431.72 M in net flows, compared with +$452.11 M for ZSP. XUS has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUS and ZSP compare?
XUS has an expense ratio of 0.09%, while ZSP has an expense ratio of 0.09%.
What are the top holdings of XUS and ZSP?
XUS's largest holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc.. ZSP's top holdings include Apple, Inc., NVIDIA Corp., and Alphabet, Inc..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUS or ZSP?
XUS holds 496 securities, while ZSP holds 494. On holdings count, XUS is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XUS and ZSP
A Guide to Active vs Passive ETFs for Canadian Investors
Discover the difference between active and passive ETFs in this comprehensive guide. Learn about their strategies, advantages, drawbacks, and how to combine both for a balanced investment approach.
Posted on 7/19/2023 by Tony Dong inETF Ecosystem
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.