VS
Compare iShares S&P 500 3% Capped Index ETF (XUSC) vs Franklin FTSE U.S. Index ETF (FLAM) to find the best fit for your portfolio. XUSC and FLAM provide the same top sector exposures: Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. When evaluating costs, XUSC features a management fee (MER) of 0.12%, compared to 0.07% for FLAM. Performance-wise, XUSC has returned 16.01% year-to-date with +$56 M in net flows, whereas FLAM is at 16.1% with -$72 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
XUSC
FLAM
| AuM | $303.20 M | $409.42 M |
| Management Fees | 0.12% | 0.07% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.13% | 0.08% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.08% | 0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | XUSC | +2.78% | +1.97% | +16.01% | +16.82% | - |
FLAM | +2.88% | +2.71% | +16.10% | +17.01% | +87.80% | |
| Flows | XUSC | +$9 M | +$23 M | +$56 M | +$86 M | - |
FLAM | -$12 M | -$13 M | -$72 M | -$56 M | +$17 M |
XUSC vs FLAM exposure
Countries
XUSC
USA
96.99%
FLAM
USA
97.23%
Sectors
XUSC
Technology
35.25%
Finance
16.50%
Healthcare
11.00%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.21%
Industrials
9.02%
Other
19.01%
FLAM
Technology
44.74%
Finance
13.90%
Healthcare
9.28%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
9.02%
Industrials
7.49%
Other
15.57%
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
XUSC
Microsoft Corp.
3.63%
NVIDIA Corp.
3.13%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.10%
Apple, Inc.
3.09%
Broadcom Inc.
2.83%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
2.30%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.98%
Tesla, Inc.
1.90%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
1.75%
Berkshire Hathaway, Inc.
1.69%
FLAM
NVIDIA Corp.
7.40%
Apple, Inc.
6.86%
Microsoft Corp.
5.59%
Amazon.com, Inc.
3.82%
Alphabet, Inc.
3.02%
Broadcom Inc.
2.50%
Alphabet, Inc.
2.43%
Meta Platforms, Inc.
1.92%
Micron Technology, Inc.
1.61%
Tesla, Inc.
1.52%
Diversification
XUSC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 503 total
25.39%
FLAM
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 495 total
36.67%
Characteristics
Compare
XUSC
FLAM
| Provider | iShares | Franklin Templeton |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD | FTSE USA NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.92% | 1.03% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | July 9, 2024 | February 20, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about XUSC and FLAM
Which ETF has performed better year to date: XUSC or FLAM?
As of October 16, 2026, XUSC has returned 16.01% year to date, while FLAM has returned 16.10%. FLAM is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: XUSC or FLAM?
As of October 16, 2026, XUSC manages $303.20 M in assets, while FLAM manages $409.42 M. FLAM is the larger fund by AUM.
How are XUSC and FLAM managed?
XUSC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P 500 3% Capped NTR Index - CAD benchmark. FLAM is passively managed by Franklin Templeton. It tracks the FTSE USA NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do XUSC and FLAM emphasize?
XUSC is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare. FLAM is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Healthcare.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: XUSC or FLAM?
Year to date, XUSC has seen +$56.26 M in net flows, compared with -$71.82 M for FLAM. XUSC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of XUSC and FLAM compare?
XUSC has an expense ratio of 0.13%, while FLAM has an expense ratio of 0.08%.
What are the top holdings of XUSC and FLAM?
XUSC's largest holdings include Microsoft Corp., NVIDIA Corp., and Amazon.com, Inc.. FLAM's top holdings include NVIDIA Corp., Apple, Inc., and Microsoft Corp..
Which ETF is more diversified: XUSC or FLAM?
XUSC holds 500 securities, while FLAM holds 488. On holdings count, XUSC is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about XUSC and FLAM
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.