VS
When evaluating costs, YPLT features a management fee (MER) of 0.4%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, YPLT has returned 27.6% year-to-date with +$14 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 12.5% with +$7 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
YPLT
XIC
| AuM | $27.13 M | $31,310.89 M |
| Management Fees | 0.40% | 0.05% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.40% | 0.06% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.10% |
Historical performance and flows
As of July 17, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | YPLT | +14.23% | -5.87% | -27.60% | -16.87% | - |
XIC | +0.59% | +3.22% | +12.50% | +31.70% | +89.28% | |
| Flows | YPLT | +$4 M | +$13 M | +$14 M | +$24 M | - |
XIC | +$820 M | +$1,912 M | +$6,530 M | +$7,821 M | +$12,618 M |
YPLT vs XIC exposure
Countries
YPLT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Canada
96.25%
Sectors
YPLT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Finance
42.08%
Energy
16.27%
Non-Energy Materials
15.91%
Industrials
8.25%
Other
17.49%
As of July 17, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
YPLT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
8.22%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.77%
Shopify, Inc.
3.97%
Bank of Montreal
3.52%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.36%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.04%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
3.01%
Brookfield Corp.
2.59%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.35%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.25%
Diversification
YPLT
Exposure data will be available soon
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 221 total
38.08%
Characteristics
Compare
YPLT
XIC
| Provider | Purpose Investments | iShares |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 36.15% | 2.00% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 20, 2025 | February 16, 2001 |
Frequently asked questions about YPLT and XIC
Which ETF has performed better year to date: YPLT or XIC?
As of July 17, 2026, YPLT has returned -27.60% year to date, while XIC has returned 12.50%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: YPLT or XIC?
As of July 17, 2026, YPLT manages $27.13 M in assets, while XIC manages $31.31 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are YPLT and XIC managed?
YPLT is actively managed by Purpose Investments. It does not track an index. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: YPLT or XIC?
Year to date, YPLT has seen +$13.91 M in net flows, compared with +$6,530.40 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of YPLT and XIC compare?
YPLT has an expense ratio of 0.40%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
Recent articles about YPLT and XIC
How to Invest in Palantir Through Thematic and Momentum ETFs
Palantir leads U.S. equities in H1 2025 as AI ETFs surge.
Posted on 7/8/2025 by Kyle Anthony inArtificial Intelligence
The Top Canadian ETFs by AUM in 2023
These ETFs rank among the largest in the Canadian industry.
Posted on 1/11/2023 by Tony Dong inETFs
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.