VS
BMO U.S. All Cap Equity Fund ETF (ZACE) and CI U.S. 1000 Index ETF (CUSM.B) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZACE focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Information Technology, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary, while CUSM.B leans towards Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary. When evaluating costs, ZACE features a management fee (MER) of 0.75%, compared to 0.16% for CUSM.B. Performance-wise, ZACE has returned 9.16% year-to-date with -$7 M in net flows, whereas CUSM.B is at 9.36% with +$38 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZACE
CUSM.B
| AuM | $57.41 M | $222.19 M |
| Management Fees | 0.75% | 0.16% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.81% | 0.17% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZACE | +3.36% | +12.69% | +9.16% | +25.61% | +88.29% |
CUSM.B | +1.24% | +11.42% | +9.36% | +25.17% | +81.68% | |
| Flows | ZACE | +$0 M | -$5 M | -$7 M | -$5 M | +$26 M |
CUSM.B | +$11 M | +$11 M | +$38 M | +$61 M | +$141 M |
ZACE vs CUSM.B exposure
Countries
ZACE
USA
92.05%
Other
7.95%
CUSM.B
USA
96.47%
Sectors
ZACE
Information Technology
33.83%
Industrials
10.59%
Consumer Discretionary
10.32%
Communication Services
10.26%
Financials
9.24%
Health Care
7.62%
Other
18.14%
CUSM.B
Information Technology
33.91%
Communication Services
10.76%
Consumer Discretionary
10.17%
Financials
9.73%
Industrials
8.81%
Health Care
8.61%
Other
18.00%
As of June 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZACE
APPLE
8.16%
MICROSOFT-T
5.29%
ALPHABET INC-CL
4.98%
NVIDIA
4.61%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.47%
VISA INCORPORATION
3.12%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.77%
BK OF AMERICA CO
2.41%
ORACLE SYS
2.22%
SHOPIFY SUBORDINATE VOTING
2.08%
CUSM.B
NVIDIA
7.02%
APPLE
5.89%
MICROSOFT-T
4.51%
AMAZON.COM INC
3.82%
ALPHABET INC-CL
3.37%
BROADCOM LIMITED
2.93%
ALPHABET INC-CL
2.90%
META PLATFORMS
2.00%
TESLA
1.67%
JPMORGAN CHASE
1.28%
Diversification
ZACE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 56 total
39.10%
CUSM.B
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 1,005 total
35.38%
Characteristics
Compare
ZACE
CUSM.B
| Provider | BMO | CI |
| Management | Actively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | - | Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.00% | 0.74% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | June 10, 2021 | August 17, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about ZACE and CUSM.B
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZACE or CUSM.B?
As of June 11, 2026, ZACE has returned 9.16% year to date, while CUSM.B has returned 9.36%. CUSM.B is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZACE or CUSM.B?
As of June 11, 2026, ZACE manages $57.41 M in assets, while CUSM.B manages $222.19 M. CUSM.B is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZACE and CUSM.B managed?
ZACE is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. CUSM.B is passively managed by CI. It tracks the Solactive GBS US 1000 Index TR - USD benchmark.
What sectors do ZACE and CUSM.B emphasize?
ZACE is most exposed to Information Technology, Industrials, and Consumer Discretionary. CUSM.B is most exposed to Information Technology, Communication Services, and Consumer Discretionary.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZACE or CUSM.B?
Year to date, ZACE has seen -$6.76 M in net flows, compared with +$37.70 M for CUSM.B. CUSM.B has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZACE and CUSM.B compare?
ZACE has an expense ratio of 0.81%, while CUSM.B has an expense ratio of 0.17%.
What are the top holdings of ZACE and CUSM.B?
ZACE's largest holdings include APPLE and MICROSOFT-T. CUSM.B's top holdings include NVIDIA, ALPHABET INC-CL, and APPLE.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZACE or CUSM.B?
ZACE holds 53 securities, while CUSM.B holds 905. On holdings count, CUSM.B is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZACE and CUSM.B
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.