VS
Compare BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA) vs Scotia International Equity Index Tracker ETF (SITI) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZEA and SITI provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, ZEA features a management fee (MER) of 0.2%, compared to 0.15% for SITI. Performance-wise, ZEA has returned 14.7% year-to-date with +$1 B in net flows, whereas SITI is at 14.55% with +$464 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZEA
SITI
| AuM | $13,939.72 M | $1,503.43 M |
| Management Fees | 0.20% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.22% | 0.22% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.36% | -0.28% |
Historical performance and flows
As of November 11, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZEA | +1.31% | -0.97% | +14.70% | +14.50% | +69.97% |
SITI | +0.94% | -1.30% | +14.55% | +14.69% | +71.41% | |
| Flows | ZEA | +$7 M | +$440 M | +$1,182 M | +$1,358 M | +$3,154 M |
SITI | +$202 M | +$341 M | +$464 M | +$491 M | +$984 M |
ZEA vs SITI exposure
Countries
ZEA
Japan
26.51%
United Kingdom
13.43%
Switzerland
8.79%
Germany
7.81%
France
7.67%
Other
35.78%
SITI
Japan
27.12%
United Kingdom
13.21%
Switzerland
8.50%
Germany
8.01%
France
7.45%
Other
35.72%
Sectors
ZEA
Finance
27.00%
Industrials
16.12%
Technology
13.28%
Healthcare
9.07%
Non-Energy Materials
7.63%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
7.61%
Other
19.29%
SITI
Finance
27.65%
Industrials
15.80%
Technology
13.57%
Healthcare
9.55%
Consumer Non-Cyclicals
8.00%
Other
25.42%
As of November 11, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZEA
US46432F8427
100.00%
SITI
ASML Holding NV
3.08%
HSBC Holdings Plc
1.53%
Roche Holding AG
1.31%
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
1.19%
Shell Plc
1.18%
Novartis AG
1.16%
AstraZeneca PLC
1.09%
Nestlé SA
1.05%
Siemens AG
1.01%
SAP SE
0.97%
Diversification
ZEA
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 2,621 total
100.00%
SITI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 894 total
13.58%
Characteristics
Compare
ZEA
SITI
| Provider | BMO | Scotia Bank |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - CAD | Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.92% | 2.32% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 10, 2014 | March 11, 2020 |
Frequently asked questions about ZEA and SITI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZEA or SITI?
As of November 11, 2026, ZEA has returned 14.70% year to date, while SITI has returned 14.55%. ZEA is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZEA or SITI?
As of November 11, 2026, ZEA manages $13.94 B in assets, while SITI manages $1.50 B. ZEA is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZEA and SITI managed?
ZEA is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI EAFE Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. SITI is passively managed by Scotia Bank. It tracks the Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex North America Large & Mid Cap CAD NTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZEA or SITI?
ZEA holds 1 securities, while SITI holds 878. On holdings count, SITI is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZEA or SITI?
Year to date, ZEA has seen +$1,181.54 M in net flows, compared with +$463.76 M for SITI. ZEA has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZEA and SITI compare?
ZEA has an expense ratio of 0.22%, while SITI has an expense ratio of 0.22%.
What sectors do ZEA and SITI emphasize?
ZEA is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. SITI is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Recent articles about ZEA and SITI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.