ZGI
BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF

Full ZGI fund page
VS
PPLN
Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index ETF - CAD

Full PPLN fund page

Compare BMO Global Infrastructure Index ETF (ZGI) vs Global X Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index ETF - CAD (PPLN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZGI provides Energy, Utilities, and Real Estate exposures, while PPLN is primarily weighted in Energy. When evaluating costs, ZGI features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.74% for PPLN. Performance-wise, ZGI has returned 10.96% year-to-date with -$6 M in net flows, whereas PPLN is at 13.92% with -$12 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.0%Mar 27Apr 6Apr 13Apr 20Apr 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of April 27, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZGI
-3.04%+8.11%+10.96%+11.10%+41.20%
PPLN
-6.08%+10.81%+13.92%+23.53%+53.32%
Flows
ZGI
-$3 M-$5 M-$6 M-$149 M-$280 M
PPLN
+$16 M-$6 M-$12 M+$64 M+$68 M

ZGI vs PPLN exposure

Countries

ZGI
USA
78.32%
Canada
21.58%
PPLN
Canada
99.54%

Sectors

ZGI
Energy
44.69%
Utilities
34.90%
Real Estate
10.32%
Other
9.98%
PPLN
Energy
78.63%
Other
21.37%
As of April 27, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZGI
ENBRIDGE
9.23%
WILLIAMS
6.90%
US6362744095
6.48%
AMERICAN TOWER CL A REIT
6.21%
KINDER MORGAN
5.13%
TC ENERGY CORP
5.11%
CHENIERE ENERGY
4.93%
SEMPRA ENERGY
4.91%
ONEOK
4.55%
TARGA RESOURCS
4.15%
PPLN
CA83671M1059
20.91%
KEYERA
20.57%
TC ENERGY CORP
19.52%
ENBRIDGE
19.28%
PEMBINA PIPELINE
19.26%

Diversification

ZGI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 49 total
57.60%
PPLN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 5 total
99.54%

Characteristics

Compare
ZGI
PPLN
ProviderBMOGlobal X
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkDow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Net Total Return Index - CADMirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.38%4.71%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJanuary 19, 2010July 14, 2014

Frequently asked questions about ZGI and PPLN

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZGI or PPLN?
As of April 27, 2026, ZGI has returned 10.96% year to date, while PPLN has returned 13.92%. PPLN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZGI or PPLN?
As of April 27, 2026, ZGI manages $478.07 M in assets, while PPLN manages $113.69 M. ZGI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZGI and PPLN managed?
ZGI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Dow Jones Brookfield Global Infrastructure North American Listed Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. PPLN is passively managed by Global X. It tracks the Mirae Asset Equal Weight Canadian Pipeline Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZGI and PPLN emphasize?
ZGI is most exposed to Energy, Utilities, and Real Estate. PPLN is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZGI or PPLN?
Year to date, ZGI has seen -$5.93 M in net flows, compared with -$11.64 M for PPLN. ZGI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZGI and PPLN compare?
ZGI has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while PPLN has an expense ratio of 0.31%.
What are the top holdings of ZGI and PPLN?
ZGI's largest holdings include ENBRIDGE and WILLIAMS. PPLN's top holdings include KEYERA and TC ENERGY CORP.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZGI or PPLN?
ZGI holds 43 securities, while PPLN holds 5. On holdings count, ZGI is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZGI and PPLN

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds