ZGIF
BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series

Full ZGIF fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

BMO Global Infrastructure Fund Active ETF Series (ZGIF) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZGIF focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Utilities, Industrials, and Energy, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, ZGIF features a management fee (MER) of 1.19%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, ZGIF has returned 8.01% year-to-date with +$2 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 29.29% with +$114 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-4.0-2.00.02.0%Sep 16Sep 23Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZGIF
+2.58%-3.20%+8.01%+4.92%+64.66%
ZEB
-0.38%-5.07%+29.29%+45.06%+164.94%
Flows
ZGIF
+$0 M+$1 M+$2 M+$2 M-$18 M
ZEB
-$450 M-$94 M+$114 M+$753 M-$879 M

ZGIF vs ZEB exposure

Countries

ZGIF
USA
47.69%
Canada
11.85%
Spain
10.40%
Other
30.05%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

ZGIF
Utilities
52.57%
Industrials
27.73%
Energy
15.18%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZGIF
Aena S.M.E. SA
6.33%
NextEra Energy, Inc.
5.38%
Duke Energy Corp.
4.47%
Transurban Group Ltd.
4.44%
Iberdrola SA
4.08%
Enbridge, Inc.
3.76%
The Southern Co.
3.70%
The Williams Cos., Inc.
3.26%
GEK Terna SA
3.16%
Union Pacific Corp.
3.14%
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%

Diversification

ZGIF
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 38 total
41.70%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
ZGIF
ZEB
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication Method-Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield2.83%2.38%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateJune 26, 2023October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about ZGIF and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZGIF or ZEB?
As of October 16, 2026, ZGIF has returned 8.01% year to date, while ZEB has returned 29.29%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZGIF or ZEB?
As of October 16, 2026, ZGIF manages $3.19 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.92 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZGIF and ZEB managed?
ZGIF is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZGIF and ZEB emphasize?
ZGIF is most exposed to Utilities, Industrials, and Energy. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZGIF or ZEB?
Year to date, ZGIF has seen +$2.14 M in net flows, compared with +$114.06 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZGIF and ZEB compare?
ZGIF has an expense ratio of 1.16%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of ZGIF and ZEB?
ZGIF's largest holdings include Aena S.M.E. SA, NextEra Energy, Inc., and Duke Energy Corp.. ZEB's top holdings include The Bank of Nova Scotia, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Royal Bank of Canada.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZGIF or ZEB?
ZGIF holds 38 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, ZGIF is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZGIF and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds