ZIN
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF

Full ZIN fund page
VS
XFN
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF

Full XFN fund page

Compare BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN) vs iShares S&P/TSX Capped Financials Index ETF (XFN) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZIN provides Industrials, Energy, and Utilities exposures, while XFN is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, ZIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for XFN. Performance-wise, ZIN has returned 20.76% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas XFN is at 18.03% with -$85 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-2.00.02.04.06.08.0%May 12May 20May 27Jun 3Jun 10

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 12, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZIN
+2.99%+15.71%+20.76%+37.97%+74.92%
XFN
+7.90%+22.72%+18.03%+48.05%+129.24%
Flows
ZIN
+$0 M-$0 M+$3 M+$5 M-$45 M
XFN
-$121 M-$122 M-$85 M-$113 M-$428 M

ZIN vs XFN exposure

Countries

ZIN
Canada
100.00%
XFN
Canada
99.71%

Sectors

ZIN
Industrials
63.50%
Other
15.82%
Energy
10.77%
Other
9.90%
XFN
Financials
89.78%
Other
10.22%
As of June 12, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZIN
CA1130061007
5.16%
BIRD CONSTRUCTION
3.94%
HAMMOND POWER SOLUTIONS
3.72%
NFI GROUP INC
3.27%
TFI INTERNATIONAL INC
3.24%
AECON GROUP
3.13%
ENERFLEX
3.10%
MULLEN GROUP
3.08%
CA8139211038
3.05%
SAVARIA
2.95%
XFN
ROYAL BK CANADA
21.23%
TORONTO DOMINION
15.27%
BANK OF MONTREAL
9.08%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
8.75%
CA11271J1075
8.41%
BNS
8.10%
MANULIFE-S
5.57%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
4.95%
SUN LIFE FINL
3.37%
FAIRFAX FINANCIAL HOLDINGS
3.01%

Diversification

ZIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 36 total
34.63%
XFN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 24 total
87.74%

Characteristics

Compare
ZIN
XFN
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CADS&P/TSX Capped Financials Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.97%2.07%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 14, 2012March 23, 2001

Frequently asked questions about ZIN and XFN

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZIN or XFN?
As of June 12, 2026, ZIN has returned 20.76% year to date, while XFN has returned 18.03%. ZIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZIN or XFN?
As of June 12, 2026, ZIN manages $55.38 M in assets, while XFN manages $2.23 B. XFN is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZIN and XFN managed?
ZIN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD benchmark. XFN is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Financials Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZIN and XFN emphasize?
ZIN is most exposed to Industrials, Energy, and Utilities. XFN is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZIN or XFN?
Year to date, ZIN has seen +$2.63 M in net flows, compared with -$84.94 M for XFN. ZIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZIN and XFN compare?
ZIN has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while XFN has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of ZIN and XFN?
ZIN's largest holdings include BIRD CONSTRUCTION and HAMMOND POWER SOLUTIONS. XFN's top holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and TORONTO DOMINION.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZIN or XFN?
ZIN holds 32 securities, while XFN holds 23. On holdings count, ZIN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZIN and XFN

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds