ZIN
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF

Full ZIN fund page
VS
ZEB
BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF

Full ZEB fund page

Compare BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN) vs BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZIN provides Industrials, Energy, and Utilities exposures, while ZEB is primarily weighted in Financials. When evaluating costs, ZIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, ZIN has returned 21.32% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 28.83% with -$553 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

0246810%May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9Jun 16

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 18, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZIN
+3.16%+13.88%+21.32%+39.14%+75.55%
ZEB
+10.76%+26.60%+28.83%+72.07%+149.94%
Flows
ZIN
+$0 M-$0 M+$3 M+$5 M-$50 M
ZEB
+$661 M+$366 M-$553 M-$355 M-$1,261 M

ZIN vs ZEB exposure

Countries

ZIN
Canada
100.00%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

ZIN
Industrials
63.50%
Other
15.82%
Energy
10.77%
Other
9.90%
ZEB
Financials
100.00%
As of June 18, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZIN
CA1130061007
5.16%
BIRD CONSTRUCTION
3.94%
HAMMOND POWER SOLUTIONS
3.72%
NFI GROUP INC
3.27%
TFI INTERNATIONAL INC
3.24%
AECON GROUP
3.13%
ENERFLEX
3.10%
MULLEN GROUP
3.08%
CA8139211038
3.05%
SAVARIA
2.95%
ZEB
TORONTO DOMINION
17.02%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
16.89%
NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA
16.73%
ROYAL BK CANADA
16.71%
BNS
16.37%
BANK OF MONTREAL
16.28%

Diversification

ZIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 36 total
34.63%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%

Characteristics

Compare
ZIN
ZEB
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.96%2.35%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 14, 2012October 20, 2009

Frequently asked questions about ZIN and ZEB

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZIN or ZEB?
As of June 18, 2026, ZIN has returned 21.32% year to date, while ZEB has returned 28.83%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZIN or ZEB?
As of June 18, 2026, ZIN manages $55.64 M in assets, while ZEB manages $6.33 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZIN and ZEB managed?
ZIN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZIN and ZEB emphasize?
ZIN is most exposed to Industrials, Energy, and Utilities. ZEB is most exposed to Financials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZIN or ZEB?
Year to date, ZIN has seen +$2.63 M in net flows, compared with -$553.47 M for ZEB. ZIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZIN and ZEB compare?
ZIN has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What are the top holdings of ZIN and ZEB?
ZIN's largest holdings include BIRD CONSTRUCTION and HAMMOND POWER SOLUTIONS. ZEB's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION, CDN IMPERIAL BK, and NATIONAL BANK OF CANADA.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZIN or ZEB?
ZIN holds 32 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, ZIN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZIN and ZEB

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds