VS
Compare BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZIN provides Industrials, Energy, and Utilities exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities. When evaluating costs, ZIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, ZIN has returned 21.57% year-to-date with +$3 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 20.15% with -$123 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZIN
ZUT
| AuM | $55.76 M | $844.73 M |
| Management Fees | 0.55% | 0.55% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.61% | 0.61% |
| Tracking Difference | -0.89% | -0.90% |
Historical performance and flows
As of June 19, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZIN | +3.37% | +15.73% | +21.57% | +39.00% | +75.92% |
ZUT | +3.37% | +8.11% | +20.15% | +28.32% | +51.67% | |
| Flows | ZIN | +$0 M | -$0 M | +$3 M | +$5 M | -$50 M |
ZUT | -$58 M | -$42 M | -$123 M | +$24 M | +$184 M |
ZIN vs ZUT exposure
Countries
ZIN
Canada
100.00%
ZUT
Canada
85.23%
Bermuda
14.77%
Sectors
ZIN
Industrials
63.50%
Other
15.82%
Energy
10.77%
Other
9.90%
ZUT
Utilities
100.00%
As of June 19, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZIN
CA1130061007
5.16%
BIRD CONSTRUCTION
3.94%
HAMMOND POWER SOLUTIONS
3.72%
NFI GROUP INC
3.27%
TFI INTERNATIONAL INC
3.24%
AECON GROUP
3.13%
ENERFLEX
3.10%
MULLEN GROUP
3.08%
CA8139211038
3.05%
SAVARIA
2.95%
ZUT
BORALEX
10.04%
NORTHLAND POWER
8.09%
ALTAGAS
8.08%
BROOKFIELD RENEWABLE PARTNERS
7.87%
ATCO
7.62%
CAPITAL POWER
7.57%
EMERA
7.48%
ALGONQUIN POWER
7.47%
CANADIAN UTILITIES
7.43%
FORTIS
7.23%
Diversification
ZIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 36 total
34.63%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
78.87%
Characteristics
Compare
ZIN
ZUT
| Provider | BMO | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.96% | 2.77% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | November 14, 2012 | January 19, 2010 |
Frequently asked questions about ZIN and ZUT
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZIN or ZUT?
As of June 19, 2026, ZIN has returned 21.57% year to date, while ZUT has returned 20.15%. ZIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZIN or ZUT?
As of June 19, 2026, ZIN manages $55.76 M in assets, while ZUT manages $844.73 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZIN and ZUT managed?
ZIN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZIN and ZUT emphasize?
ZIN is most exposed to Industrials, Energy, and Utilities. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZIN or ZUT?
Year to date, ZIN has seen +$2.63 M in net flows, compared with -$122.59 M for ZUT. ZIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZIN and ZUT compare?
ZIN has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of ZIN and ZUT?
ZIN's largest holdings include BIRD CONSTRUCTION and HAMMOND POWER SOLUTIONS. ZUT's top holdings include BORALEX, NORTHLAND POWER, and ALTAGAS.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZIN or ZUT?
ZIN holds 32 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, ZIN is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZIN and ZUT
Defense Spending and Trade Reform Could Fuel These ETFs
Canada’s Bill C-5 clears trade barriers, boosting manufacturing ETFs.
Posted on 7/3/2025 by Kyle Anthony inDefense
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.