ZIN
BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF

Full ZIN fund page
VS
ZUT
BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF

Full ZUT fund page

Compare BMO Equal Weight Industrials Index ETF (ZIN) vs BMO Equal Weight Utilities Index ETF (ZUT) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZIN provides Industrials, Energy, and Business Services exposures, while ZUT is primarily weighted in Utilities, Energy, and Industrials. When evaluating costs, ZIN features a management fee (MER) of 0.55%, compared to 0.55% for ZUT. Performance-wise, ZIN has returned 18.55% year-to-date with +$6 M in net flows, whereas ZUT is at 11.94% with -$96 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.0%Aug 17Aug 24Aug 31Sep 8Sep 15

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of September 16, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZIN
-4.82%-2.38%+18.55%+25.81%+67.03%
ZUT
-5.62%-6.95%+11.94%+17.77%+46.00%
Flows
ZIN
+$0 M+$3 M+$6 M+$3 M-$40 M
ZUT
+$16 M-$31 M-$96 M-$106 M+$221 M

ZIN vs ZUT exposure

Countries

ZIN
Canada
92.99%
USA
7.01%
ZUT
Canada
84.41%
Bermuda
15.59%

Sectors

ZIN
Industrials
74.31%
Energy
10.08%
Business Services
7.70%
Other
7.91%
ZUT
Utilities
83.73%
Energy
8.32%
Industrials
7.95%
As of September 16, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZIN
Bird Construction, Inc.
4.92%
Brookfield Business Corp.
4.71%
Mullen Group Ltd.
3.93%
NFI Group, Inc.
3.67%
Air Canada
3.55%
Russel Metals, Inc.
3.42%
Bombardier, Inc.
3.22%
Hammond Power Solutions, Inc.
3.19%
Westshore Terminals Investment Corp.
3.06%
Badger Infrastructure Solutions Ltd.
3.05%
ZUT
Boralex, Inc.
9.47%
ATCO Ltd.
8.45%
AltaGas Ltd.
8.32%
Canadian Utilities Ltd.
8.09%
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners LP
7.95%
Capital Power Corp.
7.68%
Brookfield Renewable Partners LP
7.64%
Emera, Inc.
7.35%
TransAlta Corp.
7.18%
Northland Power, Inc.
7.08%

Diversification

ZIN
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 36 total
36.73%
ZUT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 13 total
79.21%

Characteristics

Compare
ZIN
ZUT
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkSolactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CADSolactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)Direct (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.92%2.95%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateNovember 14, 2012January 19, 2010

Frequently asked questions about ZIN and ZUT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZIN or ZUT?
As of September 16, 2026, ZIN has returned 18.55% year to date, while ZUT has returned 11.94%. ZIN is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZIN or ZUT?
As of September 16, 2026, ZIN manages $57.23 M in assets, while ZUT manages $806.65 M. ZUT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZIN and ZUT managed?
ZIN is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Industrials Index - CAD benchmark. ZUT is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Utilities Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZIN and ZUT emphasize?
ZIN is most exposed to Industrials, Energy, and Business Services. ZUT is most exposed to Utilities, Energy, and Industrials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZIN or ZUT?
Year to date, ZIN has seen +$5.66 M in net flows, compared with -$96.29 M for ZUT. ZIN has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZIN and ZUT compare?
ZIN has an expense ratio of 0.61%, while ZUT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What are the top holdings of ZIN and ZUT?
ZIN's largest holdings include Bird Construction, Inc., Brookfield Business Corp., and Mullen Group Ltd.. ZUT's top holdings include Boralex, Inc., ATCO Ltd., and AltaGas Ltd..
Which ETF is more diversified: ZIN or ZUT?
ZIN holds 36 securities, while ZUT holds 13. On holdings count, ZIN is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZIN and ZUT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds