VS
When evaluating costs, ZLSU features a management fee (MER) of 0.73%, compared to 0.65% for HDIV. Performance-wise, ZLSU has returned 14.06% year-to-date with +$112 M in net flows, whereas HDIV is at 21.6% with +$645 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZLSU
HDIV
| AuM | $227.03 M | $1,963.00 M |
| Management Fees | 0.73% | 0.65% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.72% | 0.96% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 16, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZLSU | +2.79% | +3.37% | +14.06% | +11.29% | +64.05% |
HDIV | +0.62% | +1.97% | +21.60% | +27.62% | +116.68% | |
| Flows | ZLSU | -$2 M | +$4 M | +$112 M | +$113 M | +$176 M |
HDIV | +$75 M | +$218 M | +$645 M | +$759 M | +$1,216 M |
ZLSU vs HDIV exposure
Countries
ZLSU
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Sectors
ZLSU
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
As of October 16, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZLSU
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Diversification
ZLSU
Exposure data will be available soon
HDIV
Exposure data will be available soon
Characteristics
Compare
ZLSU
HDIV
| Provider | BMO | Hamilton ETFs |
| Management | Actively managed | Actively managed |
| Benchmark | - | - |
| Replication Method | - | - |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.70% | 9.58% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | October 2, 2023 | July 19, 2021 |
Frequently asked questions about ZLSU and HDIV
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZLSU or HDIV?
As of October 16, 2026, ZLSU has returned 14.06% year to date, while HDIV has returned 21.60%. HDIV is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZLSU or HDIV?
As of October 16, 2026, ZLSU manages $227.03 M in assets, while HDIV manages $1.96 B. HDIV is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZLSU and HDIV managed?
ZLSU is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. HDIV is actively managed by Hamilton ETFs. It does not track an index.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZLSU or HDIV?
Year to date, ZLSU has seen +$112.39 M in net flows, compared with +$644.66 M for HDIV. HDIV has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZLSU and HDIV compare?
ZLSU has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while HDIV has an expense ratio of 0.96%.
Recent articles about ZLSU and HDIV
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.