VS
Compare BMO S&P US Mid Cap Index ETF (ZMID) vs iShares S&P U.S. Mid-Cap Index ETF (XMC.U) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZMID and XMC.U provide the same top sector exposures: Finance, Industrials, and Technology. When evaluating costs, ZMID features a management fee (MER) of 0.15%, compared to 0.15% for XMC.U. Performance-wise, ZMID has returned 13.51% year-to-date with -$98 M in net flows, whereas XMC.U is at 11.11% with +$5 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZMID
XMC.U
| AuM | $220.41 M | $40.57 M |
| Management Fees | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.16% | 0.16% |
| Tracking Difference | 0.40% | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 26, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZMID | -0.45% | -4.46% | +13.51% | +11.45% | +61.98% |
XMC.U | +0.64% | -3.84% | +11.11% | +11.15% | +59.81% | |
| Flows | ZMID | -$6 M | -$80 M | -$98 M | -$103 M | -$117 M |
XMC.U | +$2 M | +$3 M | +$5 M | +$4 M | +$29 M |
ZMID vs XMC.U exposure
Countries
ZMID
USA
96.47%
XMC.U
USA
96.39%
Sectors
ZMID
Finance
22.84%
Industrials
16.36%
Technology
14.33%
Non-Energy Materials
10.70%
Healthcare
10.22%
Other
25.55%
XMC.U
Finance
22.77%
Industrials
16.32%
Technology
14.41%
Non-Energy Materials
10.55%
Healthcare
10.25%
Other
25.70%
As of October 26, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZMID
Twilio, Inc.
1.02%
Illumina, Inc.
0.90%
TechnipFMC plc
0.84%
Everpure, Inc.
0.83%
ATI, Inc.
0.81%
Okta, Inc.
0.78%
nVent Electric Plc
0.67%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.66%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.65%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.64%
XMC.U
Twilio, Inc.
1.00%
Illumina, Inc.
0.91%
TechnipFMC plc
0.87%
Everpure, Inc.
0.82%
Okta, Inc.
0.81%
ATI, Inc.
0.78%
nVent Electric Plc
0.68%
Carpenter Technology Corp.
0.66%
US Foods Holding Corp.
0.65%
Tenet Healthcare Corp.
0.64%
Diversification
ZMID
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 400 total
7.80%
XMC.U
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 401 total
7.83%
Characteristics
Compare
ZMID
XMC.U
| Provider | BMO | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P MidCap 400 Net Total Return Index - CAD | S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Direct (Physical) | Other |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 0.94% | 0.96% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 11, 2020 | October 22, 2019 |
Frequently asked questions about ZMID and XMC.U
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZMID or XMC.U?
As of October 26, 2026, ZMID has returned 13.51% year to date, while XMC.U has returned 11.11%. ZMID is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZMID or XMC.U?
As of October 26, 2026, ZMID manages $220.41 M in assets, while XMC.U manages $40.57 M. ZMID is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZMID and XMC.U managed?
ZMID is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark. XMC.U is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZMID and XMC.U emphasize?
ZMID is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology. XMC.U is most exposed to Finance, Industrials, and Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZMID or XMC.U?
Year to date, ZMID has seen -$97.74 M in net flows, compared with +$5.33 M for XMC.U. XMC.U has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZMID and XMC.U compare?
ZMID has an expense ratio of 0.16%, while XMC.U has an expense ratio of 0.16%.
What are the top holdings of ZMID and XMC.U?
ZMID's largest holdings include Twilio, Inc., Illumina, Inc., and TechnipFMC plc. XMC.U's top holdings include Twilio, Inc., Illumina, Inc., and TechnipFMC plc.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZMID or XMC.U?
ZMID holds 400 securities, while XMC.U holds 401. On holdings count, XMC.U is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZMID and XMC.U
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.