ZWC
BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF

Full ZWC fund page
VS
ZVC
BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF

Full ZVC fund page

BMO Canadian High Dividend Covered Call ETF (ZWC) and BMO MSCI Canada Value Index ETF (ZVC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZWC focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Financials, Energy, and Materials, while ZVC leans towards Financials, Energy, and Materials. When evaluating costs, ZWC features a management fee (MER) of 0.65%, compared to 0.35% for ZVC. Performance-wise, ZWC has returned 10.88% year-to-date with +$208 M in net flows, whereas ZVC is at 14.03% with +$4 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-1.00.01.02.03.04.0%May 11May 19May 26Jun 2Jun 9

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of June 10, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZWC
+1.23%+4.53%+10.88%+28.02%+61.44%
ZVC
+0.84%+8.57%+14.03%+40.54%+86.36%
Flows
ZWC
+$40 M+$129 M+$208 M+$282 M+$219 M
ZVC
+$2 M+$4 M+$4 M-$25 M+$13 M

ZWC vs ZVC exposure

Countries

ZWC
Canada
98.39%
ZVC
Canada
100.00%

Sectors

ZWC
Financials
37.04%
Energy
23.02%
Materials
10.11%
Utilities
8.89%
Other
7.10%
Other
13.85%
ZVC
Financials
37.43%
Energy
20.19%
Other
12.79%
Materials
10.04%
Other
19.55%
As of June 10, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZWC
ROYAL BK CANADA
7.17%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
5.89%
TORONTO DOMINION
5.89%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
5.70%
BNS
5.13%
SUNCOR ENERGY
5.00%
ENBRIDGE
4.93%
TC ENERGY CORP
3.99%
BANK OF MONTREAL
3.55%
FORTIS
3.36%
ZVC
TORONTO DOMINION
8.16%
SUNCOR ENERGY
7.20%
BNS
5.94%
BANK OF MONTREAL
5.38%
MANULIFE-S
5.06%
CA06849F1080
4.83%
CA13646K1084
4.68%
CDN NATURAL RESOURCE
4.41%
CDN IMPERIAL BK
4.23%
CENOVUS ENERGY
3.67%

Diversification

ZWC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 39 total
50.60%
ZVC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 50 total
53.56%

Characteristics

Compare
ZWC
ZVC
ProviderBMOBMO
ManagementActively managedPassively managed
Benchmark-MSCI Canada Enhanced Value Capped Index - CAD
Replication MethodDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield5.65%2.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 9, 2017October 4, 2017

Frequently asked questions about ZWC and ZVC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZWC or ZVC?
As of June 10, 2026, ZWC has returned 10.88% year to date, while ZVC has returned 14.03%. ZVC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZWC or ZVC?
As of June 10, 2026, ZWC manages $2.31 B in assets, while ZVC manages $52.18 M. ZWC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZWC and ZVC managed?
ZWC is actively managed by BMO. It does not track an index. ZVC is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the MSCI Canada Enhanced Value Capped Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZWC and ZVC emphasize?
ZWC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials. ZVC is most exposed to Financials, Energy, and Materials.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZWC or ZVC?
Year to date, ZWC has seen +$207.58 M in net flows, compared with +$4.16 M for ZVC. ZWC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZWC and ZVC compare?
ZWC has an expense ratio of 0.72%, while ZVC has an expense ratio of 0.40%.
What are the top holdings of ZWC and ZVC?
ZWC's largest holdings include ROYAL BK CANADA and CDN IMPERIAL BK. ZVC's top holdings include TORONTO DOMINION and SUNCOR ENERGY.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZWC or ZVC?
ZWC holds 34 securities, while ZVC holds 46. On holdings count, ZVC is the more diversified portfolio.

Recent articles about ZWC and ZVC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds