ZXLC
BMO SPDR Communication Services Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLC fund page
VS
XIC
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Full XIC fund page

BMO SPDR Communication Services Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLC) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLC focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Telecommunications, and Consumer Services, while XIC leans towards Finance, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy. When evaluating costs, ZXLC features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.05% for XIC. Performance-wise, ZXLC has returned 9.33% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas XIC is at 16.04% with +$11 B. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-8.0-6.0-4.0-2.00.02.0%Sep 28Oct 5Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 27, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLC
-7.58%-3.98%-9.33%-10.43%-
XIC
+2.09%+2.21%+16.04%+22.08%+108.73%
Flows
ZXLC
+$0 M+$0 M-$1 M-$1 M-
XIC
+$1,089 M+$4,543 M+$11,264 M+$12,310 M+$17,403 M

ZXLC vs XIC exposure

Countries

ZXLC
USA
99.80%
XIC
Canada
96.58%

Sectors

ZXLC
Technology
45.76%
Telecommunications
25.08%
Consumer Services
24.42%
XIC
Finance
40.52%
Non-Energy Materials
18.87%
Energy
16.69%
Industrials
7.86%
Other
16.05%
As of October 27, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLC
US81369Y8527
100.00%
XIC
Royal Bank of Canada
7.63%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
5.40%
Shopify, Inc.
4.80%
Bank of Montreal
3.19%
The Bank of Nova Scotia
3.00%
Enbridge, Inc.
2.95%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd.
2.79%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.79%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd.
2.75%
Brookfield Corp.
2.35%

Diversification

ZXLC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 24 total
100.00%
XIC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 217 total
37.65%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLC
XIC
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkCommunication Services Select Sector TR Index - USDS&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield1.16%1.95%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025February 16, 2001

Frequently asked questions about ZXLC and XIC

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLC or XIC?
As of October 27, 2026, ZXLC has returned -9.33% year to date, while XIC has returned 16.04%. XIC is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLC or XIC?
As of October 27, 2026, ZXLC manages $2.94 M in assets, while XIC manages $36.88 B. XIC is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLC and XIC managed?
ZXLC is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Communication Services Select Sector TR Index - USD benchmark. XIC is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLC or XIC?
ZXLC holds 1 securities, while XIC holds 217. On holdings count, XIC is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLC or XIC?
Year to date, ZXLC has seen -$0.74 M in net flows, compared with +$11,263.93 M for XIC. XIC has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLC and XIC compare?
ZXLC has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while XIC has an expense ratio of 0.06%.
What sectors do ZXLC and XIC emphasize?
ZXLC is most exposed to Technology, Telecommunications, and Consumer Services. XIC is most exposed to Finance, Non-Energy Materials, and Energy.

Recent articles about ZXLC and XIC

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds