VS
BMO SPDR Communication Services Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLC) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLC focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Telecommunications, and Consumer Services, while ZEB leans towards Finance. When evaluating costs, ZXLC features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.25% for ZEB. Performance-wise, ZXLC has returned 9.29% year-to-date with -$1 M in net flows, whereas ZEB is at 31.62% with +$345 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZXLC
ZEB
| AuM | $2.94 M | $7,276.96 M |
| Management Fees | 0.21% | 0.25% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.28% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.51% |
Historical performance and flows
As of October 26, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZXLC | -7.55% | -3.95% | -9.29% | -10.39% | - |
ZEB | +0.62% | -1.20% | +31.62% | +44.27% | +183.88% | |
| Flows | ZXLC | +$0 M | +$0 M | -$1 M | -$1 M | - |
ZEB | -$445 M | +$311 M | +$345 M | +$1,122 M | -$699 M |
ZXLC vs ZEB exposure
Countries
ZXLC
USA
99.80%
ZEB
Canada
100.00%
Sectors
ZXLC
Technology
45.76%
Telecommunications
25.08%
Consumer Services
24.42%
ZEB
Finance
100.00%
As of October 26, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZXLC
US81369Y8527
100.00%
ZEB
The Bank of Nova Scotia
17.59%
The Toronto-Dominion Bank
17.41%
Royal Bank of Canada
17.16%
Bank of Montreal
16.64%
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
15.79%
National Bank of Canada
15.42%
Diversification
ZXLC
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 24 total
100.00%
ZEB
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 6 total
100.00%
Characteristics
Compare
ZXLC
ZEB
| Provider | BMO | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | Communication Services Select Sector TR Index - USD | Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | Other | Direct (Physical) |
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.16% | 2.33% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 2, 2025 | October 20, 2009 |
Frequently asked questions about ZXLC and ZEB
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLC or ZEB?
As of October 26, 2026, ZXLC has returned -9.29% year to date, while ZEB has returned 31.62%. ZEB is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLC or ZEB?
As of October 26, 2026, ZXLC manages $2.94 M in assets, while ZEB manages $7.28 B. ZEB is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLC and ZEB managed?
ZXLC is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Communication Services Select Sector TR Index - USD benchmark. ZEB is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks GTR Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLC or ZEB?
ZXLC holds 1 securities, while ZEB holds 6. On holdings count, ZEB is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLC or ZEB?
Year to date, ZXLC has seen -$0.74 M in net flows, compared with +$345.48 M for ZEB. ZEB has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLC and ZEB compare?
ZXLC has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while ZEB has an expense ratio of 0.28%.
What sectors do ZXLC and ZEB emphasize?
ZXLC is most exposed to Technology, Telecommunications, and Consumer Services. ZEB is most exposed to Finance.
Recent articles about ZXLC and ZEB
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.