VS
Compare BMO SPDR Energy Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLE) vs BMO SPDR Energy Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLE.F) to find the best fit for your portfolio. ZXLE and ZXLE.F provide the same top sector exposures: Energy. When evaluating costs, ZXLE features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.21% for ZXLE.F. Performance-wise, ZXLE has returned 27.4% year-to-date with +$9 M in net flows, whereas ZXLE.F is at 27.55% with +$16 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZXLE
ZXLE.F
| AuM | $11.78 M | $21.15 M |
| Management Fees | 0.21% | 0.21% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.21% |
| Tracking Difference | - | - |
Historical performance and flows
As of April 24, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZXLE | -7.18% | +15.80% | +27.40% | +39.53% | - |
ZXLE.F | -6.41% | +16.02% | +27.55% | +39.28% | - | |
| Flows | ZXLE | +$0 M | +$7 M | +$9 M | +$2 M | - |
ZXLE.F | +$7 M | +$16 M | +$16 M | +$18 M | - |
ZXLE vs ZXLE.F exposure
Countries
ZXLE
USA
95.80%
ZXLE.F
USA
95.80%
Sectors
ZXLE
Energy
99.86%
ZXLE.F
Energy
99.86%
As of April 24, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZXLE
EXXON
23.77%
CHEVRON TEXACO
17.32%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
7.22%
EOG RESOURCES
4.15%
SCHLUMBERGER
4.07%
WILLIAMS
4.06%
VALERO ENERGY
3.99%
PHILLIPS 66
3.89%
MARATHON PETROLEUM
3.81%
KINDER MORGAN
3.48%
ZXLE.F
EXXON
23.77%
CHEVRON TEXACO
17.32%
CONOCOPHILLIPS
7.22%
EOG RESOURCES
4.15%
SCHLUMBERGER
4.07%
WILLIAMS
4.06%
VALERO ENERGY
3.99%
PHILLIPS 66
3.89%
MARATHON PETROLEUM
3.81%
KINDER MORGAN
3.48%
Diversification
ZXLE
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 22 total
75.77%
ZXLE.F
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 22 total
75.77%
Characteristics
Compare
ZXLE
ZXLE.F
| Provider | BMO | BMO |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Energy Select Sector Total Return Index - USD | S&P Energy Select Sector Total Return Index - USD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 2.68% | 1.82% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 2, 2025 | February 2, 2025 |
Frequently asked questions about ZXLE and ZXLE.F
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLE or ZXLE.F?
As of April 24, 2026, ZXLE has returned 27.40% year to date, while ZXLE.F has returned 27.55%. ZXLE.F is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLE or ZXLE.F?
As of April 24, 2026, ZXLE manages $11.78 M in assets, while ZXLE.F manages $21.15 M. ZXLE.F is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLE and ZXLE.F managed?
ZXLE is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. ZXLE.F is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark.
What sectors do ZXLE and ZXLE.F emphasize?
ZXLE is most exposed to Energy. ZXLE.F is most exposed to Energy.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLE or ZXLE.F?
Year to date, ZXLE has seen +$8.85 M in net flows, compared with +$15.59 M for ZXLE.F. ZXLE.F has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLE and ZXLE.F compare?
ZXLE has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while ZXLE.F has an expense ratio of 0.21%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLE and ZXLE.F?
ZXLE's largest holdings include EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO, and CONOCOPHILLIPS. ZXLE.F's top holdings include EXXON, CHEVRON TEXACO, and CONOCOPHILLIPS.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLE or ZXLE.F?
ZXLE holds 22 securities, while ZXLE.F holds 22. On holdings count, ZXLE is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZXLE and ZXLE.F
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.