VS
BMO SPDR Industrials Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLI) and iShares S&P Global Industrials Index ETF (XGI) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLI focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Industrials and Information Technology, while XGI leans towards Industrials and Information Technology. When evaluating costs, ZXLI features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.63% for XGI. Performance-wise, ZXLI has returned 12.41% year-to-date with +$16 M in net flows, whereas XGI is at 11.37% with +$5 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.
NAV Performance and Flows
Key Data
Compare
ZXLI
XGI
| AuM | $24.05 M | $157.06 M |
| Management Fees | 0.21% | 0.63% |
| Exp. ratio | 0.21% | 0.66% |
| Tracking Difference | - | -0.34% |
Historical performance and flows
As of May 12, 2026
| 1M | 3M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Perf. | ZXLI | +0.27% | +1.76% | +12.41% | +23.01% | - |
XGI | +0.62% | +0.68% | +11.37% | +24.75% | +76.53% | |
| Flows | ZXLI | +$1 M | -$4 M | +$16 M | +$18 M | - |
XGI | +$2 M | -$1 M | +$5 M | +$5 M | +$46 M |
ZXLI vs XGI exposure
Countries
ZXLI
USA
93.12%
XGI
USA
51.69%
Japan
13.91%
Other
34.40%
Sectors
ZXLI
Industrials
91.84%
Other
8.16%
XGI
Industrials
92.15%
Other
7.85%
As of May 12, 2026
Top 10 Holdings
ZXLI
CATERPILLAR
6.53%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
5.89%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
5.13%
US36828A1016
4.66%
BOEING U
3.09%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
2.93%
UNION PACIFIC U
2.85%
HONEYWELL INTL
2.84%
DEERE
2.81%
EATON CORP PLC
2.75%
XGI
CATERPILLAR
3.60%
GENERAL ELECTRIC
3.25%
RAYTHEON TECHNOLOGIES CORPORD
2.83%
US36828A1016
2.57%
SIEMENS
1.91%
BOEING U
1.71%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC
1.62%
UNION PACIFIC U
1.57%
HONEYWELL INTL
1.57%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE
1.56%
Diversification
ZXLI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 79 total
39.48%
XGI
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 212 total
22.20%
Characteristics
Compare
ZXLI
XGI
| Provider | BMO | iShares |
| Management | Passively managed | Passively managed |
| Benchmark | S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD | S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD |
| Replication Method | ||
| Asset Class | Equity | Equity |
| Dividend Policy | Distributing | Distributing |
| Trailing 12m distribution yield | 1.85% | 1.39% |
| Meets ESG criteria | No | No |
| Inception Date | February 2, 2025 | March 26, 2013 |
Frequently asked questions about ZXLI and XGI
Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLI or XGI?
As of May 12, 2026, ZXLI has returned 12.41% year to date, while XGI has returned 11.37%. ZXLI is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLI or XGI?
As of May 12, 2026, ZXLI manages $24.05 M in assets, while XGI manages $157.06 M. XGI is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLI and XGI managed?
ZXLI is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Industrial Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. XGI is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P Global 1200 Industrials CAD Hedged Net Total Return Index - CAD benchmark.
What sectors do ZXLI and XGI emphasize?
ZXLI is most exposed to Industrials and Information Technology. XGI is most exposed to Industrials and Information Technology.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLI or XGI?
Year to date, ZXLI has seen +$16.36 M in net flows, compared with +$4.79 M for XGI. ZXLI has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLI and XGI compare?
ZXLI has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while XGI has an expense ratio of 0.66%.
What are the top holdings of ZXLI and XGI?
ZXLI's largest holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC. XGI's top holdings include CATERPILLAR and GENERAL ELECTRIC.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLI or XGI?
ZXLI holds 77 securities, while XGI holds 197. On holdings count, XGI is the more diversified portfolio.
Recent articles about ZXLI and XGI
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.