ZXLK
BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF

Full ZXLK fund page
VS
XIT
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF

Full XIT fund page

BMO SPDR Technology Select Sector Index ETF (ZXLK) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index ETF (XIT) offer distinct profiles for Canadian ETF investors. A direct comparison shows that ZXLK focuses its top 3 sector exposures on Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials, while XIT leans towards Technology, Finance, and Consumer Cyclicals. When evaluating costs, ZXLK features a management fee (MER) of 0.21%, compared to 0.55% for XIT. Performance-wise, ZXLK has returned 27.18% year-to-date with +$14 M in net flows, whereas XIT is at 3.03% with +$9 M. Use the comparison tool below to benchmark these funds across top 10 holdings, yield, sector weights and historical returns.

NAV Performance and Flows

-10.0-5.00.05.0%Sep 30Oct 7Oct 15Oct 22Oct 29

Key Data

Historical performance and flows

As of October 30, 2026
1M3MYTD1Y3Y
Perf.
ZXLK
-9.99%+1.99%+27.18%+19.76%-
XIT
+1.06%+8.20%+3.03%-6.43%+96.94%
Flows
ZXLK
-$7 M+$13 M+$14 M+$13 M-
XIT
-$8 M-$32 M+$9 M+$17 M-$183 M

ZXLK vs XIT exposure

Countries

ZXLK
USA
97.44%
XIT
Canada
99.97%

Sectors

ZXLK
Technology
96.17%
XIT
Technology
73.44%
Finance
25.58%
As of October 30, 2026

Top 10 Holdings

ZXLK
US81369Y8030
100.00%
XIT
Shopify, Inc.
25.58%
Constellation Software, Inc.
25.26%
Celestica, Inc.
24.51%
CGI, Inc.
8.40%
The Descartes Systems Group, Inc.
4.68%
Open Text Corp.
3.66%
BlackBerry Ltd.
3.57%
Kinaxis, Inc.
2.30%
Lightspeed Commerce, Inc.
0.79%
Enghouse Systems Ltd.
0.35%

Diversification

ZXLK
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 74 total
100.00%
XIT
Total weight of top 10 holdings out of 15 total
99.12%

Characteristics

Compare
ZXLK
XIT
ProviderBMOiShares
ManagementPassively managedPassively managed
BenchmarkS&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USDS&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index - CAD
Replication MethodOtherDirect (Physical)
Asset ClassEquityEquity
Dividend PolicyDistributingDistributing
Trailing 12m distribution yield0.24%0.00%
Meets ESG criteriaNoNo
Inception DateFebruary 2, 2025March 19, 2001

Frequently asked questions about ZXLK and XIT

Which ETF has performed better year to date: ZXLK or XIT?
As of October 30, 2026, ZXLK has returned 27.18% year to date, while XIT has returned 3.03%. ZXLK is ahead on YTD performance.
Which ETF is larger by assets under management: ZXLK or XIT?
As of October 30, 2026, ZXLK manages $26.16 M in assets, while XIT manages $755.44 M. XIT is the larger fund by AUM.
How are ZXLK and XIT managed?
ZXLK is passively managed by BMO. It tracks the S&P Technology Select Sector Total Return Index - USD benchmark. XIT is passively managed by iShares. It tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Information Technology Index - CAD benchmark.
Which ETF is more diversified: ZXLK or XIT?
ZXLK holds 1 securities, while XIT holds 15. On holdings count, XIT is the more diversified portfolio.
Which ETF is attracting more investor flows: ZXLK or XIT?
Year to date, ZXLK has seen +$13.61 M in net flows, compared with +$9.23 M for XIT. ZXLK has attracted more net investor money so far.
How do the fees of ZXLK and XIT compare?
ZXLK has an expense ratio of 0.21%, while XIT has an expense ratio of 0.61%.
What sectors do ZXLK and XIT emphasize?
ZXLK is most exposed to Technology, Business Services, and Non-Energy Materials. XIT is most exposed to Technology, Finance, and Consumer Cyclicals.

Recent articles about ZXLK and XIT

CboeTrackinsight
The ETF Market Canada is brought to you by Cboe in partnership with Trackinsight SA who is providing all the data, analysis and editorial content on this site. Unless explicitly stated as such, any information that you receive is not real-time.

All content on the ETF Market Canada is for your general information use only, Cboe is not responsible for any use of content by you outside this scope. In particular, the content does not constitute any form of advice, recommendation, representation, endorsement or arrangement by Cboe and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any specific investment or other decisions.
diamonds